Agreed. 

So long as we avoid "undeliverable", because what are we trying to deliver?

J.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] For discussion Recommendation 5
From: Emily Taylor <emily@emilytaylor.eu>
Date: Wed, April 11, 2012 11:51 am
To: Susan Kawaguchi <susank@fb.com>
Cc: "rt4-whois@icann.org" <rt4-whois@icann.org>

Nicely done, Susan

Thank you.

How about "substantial failure or full failure (as defined in the..."



On 11 April 2012 17:33, Susan Kawaguchi <susank@fb.com> wrote:
I reviewed the NORC study again it was a good refresher.    In my mind we have at least two choices in wording on the rec. as the comments indicated we do not use the same terminology in the recommendation as the study did. 
Current language 

  1. ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of unreachable WHOIS registrations (as defined by the NORC Data Accuracy Study, 2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over the following 12 months. 

    ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of undeliverable (also mentions unreliable) WHOIS registrations (as defined by the NORC Data Accuracy Study, 2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over the following 12 months

    I think it would be abundantly clear if we used the term substantial failure in the recommendation 
    ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of WHOIS registrations with a substantial failure (as defined by the NORC Data Accuracy Study, 2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over the following 12 months

    Page 3 of the study outlines Accuracy Groups 

    Margin of error (4)
    No failure
    Met all three criteria fully - deliverable address, name linked to address, and registrant confirmed ownership and correctness of all details during interview
    353
    23,117,442
    22.8%
    1.4%
    Minimal failure
    All criteria met but minor fault noted by registrant during interview
    17
    1,101,176
    1.1%
    0.2%
    Name unable to be linked to address, but able to locate registrant and confirm ownership
    312
    23,024,007
    22.7%
    2.2%
    Limited failure
    Deliverable address, name linked and/or located, but unable to interview registrant to obtain confirmation.
    365
    24,893,476
    24.6%
    1.7%
    Substantial failure
    Undeliverable address and/or unlinkable name, however registrant located. Unable to interview registrant to obtain confirmation.
    109
    7,202,472
    7.1%
    0.9%
    Deliverable address, but unable to link or even locate the registrant, removing any chance of interview.
    177
    13,949,721
    13.8%
    2.2%
    Full failure
    Failed on all criteria - undeliverable address and unlinkable, missing, or patently false name, unable to locate to interview
    Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.

Phone - 650 485-6064

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois




--


  

                                                                                                                                            

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily@emilytaylor.eu

www.etlaw.co.uk

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois