Team:

My comments / edits to the recommendations attached.  Please note that I still believe we should structure our Recommendations as previously discussed (and copied below).  Also, Susan and I met yesterday to finish up the Proxy recommendations, so she should have something shortly.

Thanks--

J.

---------------------
Bearing this in mind, I submit that recommendations should include the following elements:
(1) Target (To whom are we directing the recommendation?)
(2) Mechanism (By what means will the recommended action be implemented?)
(3) Timeframe (What is the deadline for action? Note that in ICANN as well as the general world, if something is left open-ended, it will never be completed.)
(4) Communication, Measurement & Follow-up (Was implementation complete? Did it work? What can the next WHOIS RT take away from it?)
--------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Current recommendations
From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org>
Date: Tue, November 22, 2011 10:30 am
To: "rt4-whois@icann.org" <rt4-whois@icann.org>

Dear Review Team Members,

A basic compilation of agreed upon recommendations is attached for your convenience. 
The second attachment is the same document lightly edited by Emily to eliminate redundancies.
Please review both and email any feedback you may have.

Thanks,

Kind regards

Alice
-- 
Alice Jansen
Assistant, Organizational Reviews
6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5
B-1040 Brussels
Belgium
Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64
Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56
Skype: alice_jansen_icann


_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois