-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Requesting team feedback on questionnaire for
consumer trust survey
From: Omar Kaminski <
omar@kaminski.adv.br>
Date: Sun, September 25, 2011 6:34 pm
To:
Woeber@cc.univie.ac.atCc:
lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com,
rt4-whois@icann.org, Jonathan
Yardley <
jyardley@userinsight.com>
Dear Wilfried, team,
I arrived a couple of hours, had to sleep in SP because our airport is
being reformed (the Word Soccer Cup, you know, then Olympic games),
but even not reviewing the document itself I agree with him about Red
Cross. Never heard about Yelp and Living Social, GroupOn seems "very
consumer trust" and FourSquare has the potential of being big -
everybody likes to show the "important" check ins. With privacy
impacts maybe not more than the others.
I'll should raise some more specific points later.
Best,
Omar
2011/9/25 Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet <
Woeber@cc.univie.ac.at>:
> A couple of thoughts, probably not all too well reviewed and sorted right
> now. It is Sunday late night here :-)
>
> To start with, depending on the countries you want to use this in, the
> Red Cross may not be the perfect site, as it is linked to Christianity.
> There's also a Red Halfmoon and a Red Diamond organisation :-)
>
> A few personal remarks regarding some of the proposed questions...
>
> Q6: I am wondering how useful the explicit mentioning of particular companies
> or services is in this (global) context.
>
> Although I consider myself almost an Internet-Junkie, I wouldn't know what
> Yelp, Groupon, Living Social or Gilt is. Maybe I'm living on the wrong side
> of the Digital Divide, being a Silver Surfer of the early Internet Days :-)
> Same for FourSquare... Yes, I could use Google :-)
>
> Q8: none of that would fit my use:
> which is testing new (DNS and DNSsec) technology and use for teaching.
>
> Q9: I wouldn't know what to do with this one?
>
> Q10: wondering - is HTTPS vs unsecured (HTTP) an issue in this context?
>
> Fwiw, hth,
> Wilfried.
>
>
lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> I am forwarding below the preliminary questionnaire for the consumer
>> trust survey, attached to this message.
>> (The User Insight team is okay with this being distributed on the Whois
>> email list.)
>> I have copied Jonathan Yardley on this message as a courtesy.
>>
>> We are working with a tight deadline and we need feedback this weekend.
>> I know this is a dedicated
>> team so appreciate your time in off business hours.
>>
>> In particular, please see the last section of questions. As the last
>> part of the survey, we would like for the participants to
>> actually experience the Whois lookup. We need to decide on a website
>> domain name to use for this purpose.
>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a well known global website we could
>> use in the survey? My sense is that
>> Wikipedia would be recognized in Europe and North America but not sure
>> if it would work everywhere.
>> But it would be neutral in the sense that it is not a trading or
>> commercial website.
>>
>> Another question is which Whois lookup page should we use?
>> My thought is to use the InterNIC one because it covers all current
>> registries. Here is the link for reference:
>>
http://www.internic.net/whois.html>>
>> I am thinking that InterNIC is more "neutral" than trying to use
>> the Whois page of one of the bigger registries or registrars.
>> Kathy and James - as representatives of the registry and registrar
>> constituency, would especially appreciate your
>> suggestions on this point. Note that we would lose the point about
>> domain ads being displayed if we decide to use InterNIC.
>>
>> The alternative would be to choose 3 WHOIS lookup pages. The survey
>> would have each participant look at 2 of them and
>> the surveys would be distributed to obtain balanced results among those
>> 3. I am just not sure how to pick 3.
>>
>> Please note that all the questions will be translated to the primary
>> language for each country.
>> Also, there are some questions with specific examples that will be
>> modified for appropriate examples in each country.
>> The English questions here are using U.S. examples.
>>
>> Sarmad, I will follow up with you separately on the point about
>> non-Latin characters being unavailable in Whois lookups.
>>
>> Please come back to me with any other questions.
>> Best regards to all,
>> Lynn
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Version 2
>> From: Jonathan Yardley <
jyardley@userinsight.com>> <
mailto:jyardley@userinsight.com>>
>> Date: Fri, September 23, 2011 2:32 pm
>> To:
lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com>> <
mailto:lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com>,
jmorgan@userinsight.com>> <
mailto:jmorgan@userinsight.com>, Rachel
>> Walsh <
rwalsh@userinsight.com ><
mailto:rwalsh@userinsight.com>>
>>
>> Hi Lynn,
>> Here is V2. Please socialize with your team. In particular we would
>> like help with selecting a universal URL for people to search for
>> the owner of.
>> Thanks-JCY
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Yardley
>> Director, Project Management
>>
jyardley@userinsight.com <
mailto:jyardley@userinsight.com>
>>
>> UserInsight
>> T 770 391 1099 ext. 1401
>> C 404 542 8594
>> Ui Blog | @UserInsight | AIM: jonyard
>>
>> An Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Company - 2008, 2009 & 2010
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rt4-whois mailing list
>>
Rt4-whois@icann.org>>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
>
Rt4-whois@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois>