Very good point thanks!

So, should I take this as an objection to mentioning the existence of
the RT during the RIPE Meeting in Rome, next week?

Wilfried

Dr. Sarmad Hussain wrote:

Emily Taylor wrote:

[...]

- Planning our outreach:  who do we need to speak to within the ICANN

Community?  Can we also think about who *outside* the community needs

to give input?  How do we structure our outreach. I'd like to get as

many

of the Team involved in reaching back to their sponsoring communities

throughout our work.

Frst of all, I think all of us who have been endorsed by a sponsoring

group

should regularly take summaries and relevant piecces of discussion back

to

their dens. I certainly plan to do that for the Address Council on a

regular

basis. Any objections?

It is a good idea to report back to sponsoring groups and to the community

as well.  However, deriving individual summaries from discussions and

sharing them with others outside the group, who are less aware of the

context of such discussions, may send different messages through different

channels and may not be effective.  Thus, I would suggest that we should

formally release summary documents for that purpose at appropriate times as

we progress.

Regards,

Sarmad

_______________________________________________

Rt4-whois mailing list

Rt4-whois@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322
emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk