Can’t Word and other programs just do this at a click of a computer key?
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lynn Goodendorf
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:01 AM
To: Emily Taylor; lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com
Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version
Thanks for the clarification Emily.
I still have a reluctance for ICANN staff to spend time on this but feel reassured in that both
documents have been published.
Lynn
Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP
VP - Data Privacy Services
VerSprite - Navigate Beyond Risk
(Main) 1.678.278.8312 | (Direct) 1.404.333.3779 | (Fax) 1.678.222.3401
www.versprite.com |twitter: @VerSprite
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] on behalf of Emily Taylor [emily@emilytaylor.eu]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:18 AM
To: lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com
Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version
Hi there
Just to be clear what I'm proposing, Lynn
I don't propose that we publish our working discussions, merely the differences between our two public documents. This is similar to what was done by ICANN for the various versions of the gTLD applicant guidebook. I found it very helpful because if you have read the whole document once, you can then concentrate on what has changed.
So, it's just highlighting differences in the two published texts.
Kind regards
Emily
On 17 May 2012 13:16, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:
If we have the discretion to decline this request, it seems like unnecessary work to me.
The principle that we have emphasized is that this is a consensus based output and we did work hard to achieve that. and we have followed all the transparency practices as we progressed.
Lynn
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Taylor <emily@emilytaylor.eu>
Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:09
To: <rt4-whois@icann.org>
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version
_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
--
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily@emilytaylor.eu
www.etlaw.co.uk
Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.