-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday
From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>
Date: Thu, March 10, 2011 9:32 am
To: "rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS" <rt4-whois@icann.org>

Dear all

Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen. Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done. I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process.

Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts:

- We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned
- The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00
- Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire.
- Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community.

So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments. It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering. The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon.

Please let me know what you think.

Kind regards


Emily


76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322
emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

---

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois