One final note to all - we finished last week's two hour session on the question box, questions 9-13. After the review of the few edits and changes to prior sections, I would recommend that we start at these questions, review the following section, "Cost Impact & Considerations," and then I think we are done!

Best,
Kathy
Attachment:  Discussion paper, same version as my last email (Peter/Kathy edits)




Hello all,

 

Unfortunately I won’t be able to make tonight’s call on the discussion paper, and have instead made some comments and suggestions in the attached (in revision mode, and with comment boxes) which I hope will be helpful.

 

I think the paper is starting to look very good, and one that will hopefully draw out some useful community feedback.

 

As you’ll see, I’ve noted a couple of questions that I think we’d already agreed to delete, and also proposed an additional sub-component to one question which I’d be very interested to get community feedback on. I’ve also commented on the proposed ‘costs’ section of the paper, which I have some questions and concerns about.

 

I look forward to reviewing the version that comes out of tonight’s call asap after its available.

 

Cheers,

 

Peter

 

From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 6:22 PM
To: rt4-whois@icann.org
Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review - updated draft following today's call

 

Dear Review Team Members,

Today’s call, chaired by Kathy and attended by Peter, Susan, Bill, Kim and Omar, focused on agenda item 1, advancing the issues paper. Edits were made up to the end of the second question box on page 5, as marked in the attached version. The list of consensus policies was moved above the first question box and the team decided to include hyperlinks to main documents.

 

PLEASE NOTE: When adding the hyperlinks, I noted that items 3 and 4 in the consensus policy list on page 4 seem to relate to the same instrument, notably the WHOIS Marketing Restriction Policy, so I reflected that in the drafting, marked by red. This is to be confirmed, though!

 

Also, please correct (and bear with me…) if I missed or misunderstood any of the decided edits.

 

Very best regards

 

Olof

 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties.


If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.


Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois