We all have different perspectives to contribute and I feel the exchange of ideas is good.
I did recall this discussion in London but still find it of interest.
-Lynn
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] FW: [IP] Internet Security Savvy is Critical
as Egyptian Government Blocks Websites, Arrests Activists in Response to
Continued Protest | Electronic Frontier Foundation
From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
Date: Wed, February 02, 2011 3:46 am
To: rt4-whois@icann.org

* Smith, Bill wrote:
> While I agree that identifying use cases for Whois data is an interesting
> exercise, I respectfully suggest that it is beyond the remit of this
> Review Team.

We discussed this point in London as one of the first items on the agenda
and came to the conclusion, that we have a clear definition from ICANN:

Whois is a "timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and
complete information, including registrant, technical, billing, and
administrative contact information."

If we take this point deeply serious, we do not need a subgroup of
(inter)national law as well a subgroup of law enforcement definition,
because we only have a mandate to check the current policies how they
support the requirement above.

Please forgive me, that I expressed my personal view outside this group and
informed you about it.
_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois