Thank you very much for your comments. I like your revised definitions too. I think they fairly reflect the reasoning which you put forward on behalf of the subteam in our recent call. The reasoning will also help those who provide input to understand how we got to these definitions. Like you, I look forward to hearing from other members of the Team.

On 19 Feb 2011, at 21:03, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

Hi Emily,
Many thanks for your work on this suggested questionnaire. I feel that these are all relevant and appropriate questions to include in a survey related to the goal of promoting consumer trust in the context of WHOIS data.

My individual view is that I am quite happy to have this included in the material for public comment. But I do not speak for the entire sub-group and hope that they will share my perspective or propose revisions/edits to
what you have put forward.

Best regards,
Lynn

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Suggested questionnaire for "promotes consumer trust"
From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>
Date: Sat, February 19, 2011 7:46 am
To: "Dr.Sarmad Hussain" <sarmad@cantab.net>, Olivier ITEANU
<oiteanu@iteanu.com>, lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com, Peter Nettlefold
<Peter.Nettlefold@dbcde.gov.au>;, Bill Smith <bill.smith@paypal-inc.com>;
Cc: "rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS" <rt4-whois@icann.org>

Dear all

Following my previous message, I attach my suggestions on how to convert the content of section 2 of the Subteam's paper into a questionnaire. You'll see that I have put plenty of comments to ask for your views and/or clarification.

I hope this is helpful in assisting us to meet our deadline of Wednesday 24 February for our call for public comment.

Best wishes

Emily

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322
emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322
emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk