Dear Lynn, Seth, and Susan
Thank you. This draft is really coming together.
Following on from an unrelated thread started by you, Lynn, and supported by Michael, I'd like to suggest that we take a close look at whether some of the detail (on methodology; countries surveyed; etc) from these pages might sit better in an appendix, to improve the flow of the whole report. We need the reasons why we did the study; that it was multi-national and multi-lingual, that it comprised both qual and quant. Then the findings, which are very economically written and lead in well to the recommendations.
What do you think?
Kind regards
Emily
Thank you Lynn.
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 5:23 AM
To: Emily Taylor
Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Consumer Trust Research Summary
Seth, Susan and I have been working via email due to our time zone differences.
I am waiting for Seth to confirm but believe we have come to an agreement on our revisions and edits.
Attached is our clean updated draft and our most recent marked up copy with comments.
Since we are so close to the deadline, I am taking the liberty of sending this forward now.
Lynn
_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
