My comments on the current draft of Recommendation 10: Data Access- Privacy and Proxy Services
Findings: Para 2: I agree with Peter to delete the word “legitimate”.
Recommendations: top of next page beginning with “ICANN could, for example, use a mix of”: I would delete the phrase “to encourage proxy/privacy service providers to become accredited”. Leaving the phrase in suggests that ICANN could tolerate a community of non-accredited proxy/privacy providers and I feel this is the wrong message to send.
Same page bullet two: I am still confused who is provide the full details and if the details are of the service provider or the beneficiary user.
Last paragraph last bullet. I like Peter’s comment “Clarifying the issue of rights/responsibilities/liabilities should be an essential part of the proxy/privacy discussion, with the goal being clear and comprehensive guidance for the community.” (I’ve tried to improve it a little). Can we place this statement above as a recommendation separate from the bullet points, perhaps as the second, third or fourth paragraph under Recommendations. I sense that strengthening this statement could address Susan’s concerns as well.
Seth
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Nettlefold, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:51 PM
To: rt4-whois@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Executive Summary [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all,
In advance of tonight’s call, I just wanted to note that there seem to be two versions on v6 out there – one I sent yesterday with ‘v6 pn’ in the title, and more recent version sent by Susan with ‘v6 Susan’s comments’.
I’m not commenting on the content as such, but just noting the version issue.
Cheers,
Peter
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012 9:53 AM
To: rt4-whois@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Executive Summary
Hi All,
I am sorry that I will not be able to attend the meeting in a few hours (it's at 2am my time). Thanks to everyone for all the discussion and editing! I support the Executive Summary and IDN Comments.
I wanted to share a particular support for the new proxy/privacy point that Peter added.
providing clear and unambiguous guidance on the rights and responsibilities of registered name holders, and how those should be managed in the privacy/proxy environment
I'm happy to work with Alice on removing all the comments I inserted... and regards to all!
Kathy
:
Thank you all for your hard work on the executive summary. I have made a few comments but for the most part I am in agreement with the current draft.
Talk to you tonight.
Susan Kawaguchi
Domain Name Manager
Facebook Legal Dept.
Phone - 650 485-6064
_______________________________________________Rt4-whois mailing listRt4-whois@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------