Proposed Definition: "Consumer"
Ok, though with minor wording adjustments; see below. From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:21 PM To: RT4 WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposed Definition: "Consumer" Team: As discussed during our call, here is the proposed bifurcated definition of "consumer" for inclusion in our call for comments. It has been chopped up a bit for readability, but I did endeavor to preserve the overall meaning. I've also modified the "Feedback Requested" to be more open ended. Thoughts / feeedback? I'm off to bed now, but will check back in a few hours. Thanks-- J. _________________________________ In the global sense, "consumer" may mean: * All Internet users including natural persons, commercial and non-commercial entities, government and academic entities, And specifically within the context of this review, a "consumer" w.r.t. WHOIS data and Whois Service may mean: * Any consumer that acts as a Producer of WHOIS data (see above), Maintainer of WHOIS data and Provider of Whois Service (e.g. Registrars), and User of WHOIS data (e.g. individuals, commercial or non-commercial entities who legitimately query the WHOIS data.). Feedback request from community Community feedback is desired on the WHOIS Review Team's approach to this definition. Is it too broad or too restrictive? In either case, how should it be changed. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3475 - Release Date: 03/02/11 00:34:00
Hi James, and Sarmad Thank you both for this contribution, which I think captures the discussion we had this morning. I propose to take Sarmad's amended version for insertion into the public comment document, unless I hear any contrary views by 0800 UTC tomorrow (Thursday). We can then publish the Call for Public Comment, which would be greatly appreciated. Well done everyone. Kind regards Emily On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Dr. Sarmad Hussain <sarmad@cantab.net>wrote:
Ok, though with minor wording adjustments; see below.
*From:* rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *James M. Bladel *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:21 PM *To:* RT4 WHOIS *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Proposed Definition: "Consumer"
Team:
As discussed during our call, here is the proposed bifurcated definition of "consumer" for inclusion in our call for comments. It has been chopped up a bit for readability, but I did endeavor to preserve the overall meaning.
I've also modified the "Feedback Requested" to be more open ended.
Thoughts / feeedback? I'm off to bed now, but will check back in a few hours.
Thanks--
J.
_________________________________
*In the global sense, "consumer" **may **mean:*
* * All Internet users including natural persons, commercial and non-commercial entities, government and academic entities,
*
*
*
*And specifically within the context of this review, a "**consumer**"**w.r.t. WHOIS data and **W**hois** **Service** **may **mean:*
** Any consumer that acts as a Producer of WHOIS data (see above), Maintainer** of WHOIS data and Provider of Whois Service** (e.g. Registrars), and User** of WHOIS data **(e.g. individuals, commercial or non-commercial entities who legitimately query the WHOIS data.).*
*
*
*Feedback request from community*
Community feedback is desired on the WHOIS Review Team's approach to this definition. Is it too broad or too restrictive? In either case, how should it be changed.
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3475 - Release Date: 03/02/11 00:34:00
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
participants (3)
-
Dr. Sarmad Hussain -
Emily Taylor -
James M. Bladel