Dear All, I am suggesting some very small edits to the "clarity of existing policy" section of your draft Discussion Paper on page 4, and to the first two questions on your list. I think that the current language regarding consensus policies and the ICANN PDP may be slightly difficult for commenters to understand, and I hope to make the related questions clearer as well. I am sorry that I cannot participate on your upcoming call to answer questions but I am happy to explain further via email. Best regards, Liz Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor ICANN
Dear Liz, Team, I believe you pointed right about carefully (re)considering the "Cost Impact & Considerations" section in terms of our scope of work. Best, Omar 2011/6/7 Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@icann.org>:
Dear All,
I am suggesting some very small edits to the “clarity of existing policy” section of your draft Discussion Paper on page 4, and to the first two questions on your list. I think that the current language regarding consensus policies and the ICANN PDP may be slightly difficult for commenters to understand, and I hope to make the related questions clearer as well.
I am sorry that I cannot participate on your upcoming call to answer questions but I am happy to explain further via email.
Best regards, Liz
Liz Gasster
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
participants (2)
-
Liz Gasster -
Omar Kaminski