Re: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Dear All, As ICANN do not sign contracts, I am going to undertake that on behalf of the group with the hotel.Obviously this comes with a liaibility to pay whatever happens and I need to do this early next week, so really do need to press on how many, and for how long. I am happy to accommodate you all as long as possible, as we have waited for a long time to meet and the subject matter and surrounding issues are very complex. I really hope this is going to be the solid foundation on which we build our work. So - very flexible this end - am keeping most of week clear to accomodate any special requests or travel arrangements - but need to now hotel numbers and dates by Monday. Have a good weekend, and happy travels to those travelling from Columbia. Best Wishes Sharon -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 December 2010 09:10 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels Dear all I've been reviewing these threads re: London. I appreciate the comments that have been made, and the work that Olof Alice and the staffers are doing on the logistics. Given that so few of us made it to Cartagena, I view the informal meeting up the night before as an important part of our team building. I can understand that travelling from Brussels may be possible on the morning, but hear what others say about the length of flights from other European destinations. Please can we extend an extra night in the hotel for members of the team who do not want to travel on the morning. I'm also looking at the agenda over the next day or two, and hear what the US contingent say about planning for 2 full days. Before Kathy and I take this on board - are there any comments in favour of the original plan, ie stopping around 1400 or 1500 to allow those with flights home to catch them. My usual experience of the last afternoon of meetings of this kind is that the group dwindles in size as people catch their planes. Any comments? On 8 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Smith, Bill wrote: =0D Olof, I appreciate, support, and practice responsible spending. I think we also need to be respectful of individuals and what we might be asking them to do in the name of fiscal responsibility and the risks we are taking by asking people to arrive on the first day of our meeting and leave on the second. WIth that in mind, I believe we are under-estimating the number of hotel nights that we will need for a two-day meeting (or even the current proposal for a day and a half). While it may be possible for some to arrive in London the morning of our meeting, to do so may require them to secure very early morning flights or trains and we run the risk that those individuals will be delayed, perhaps significantly. I have attended meetings with very tight travel arrangements, but tend to do so only when absolutely necessary. Also, asking that we plan to leave London on the evening of our second day is impractical at best for some of us. Regards Bill On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Olof Nordling wrote: Hello Kathy, Our thinking was to be parsimonious with the budget and count on Europeans being able to reach London the same morning (like Alice and I have planned), especially since UK time adds a cushion of one hour for those in continental Europe. However, it's the Review Team's choice - and there is also a risk factor with counting on early morning flights into London in January (for obvious reasons like snow - 5 cm is enough to close Heathrow- and fog, as long as the EU hasn't harmonized European climate to Portuguese standards...) so yes, it is possible. All the best Olof From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:51 PM To: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen; Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: London trip -- dates Hi All, The agenda is still under review, but let me share with you the vision that we have, and the agenda overview that we are planning (below). It is modeled on the schedule of the PIR Board agenda (which works well for getting a lot of work done in a short time). Given the long day of the main meeting (Wednesday), it is central that people arrive the day before... and be fully rested and refreshed for our long day on Wed! Is that possible? Best, Kathy -------------------------------------------------- Agenda of the Whois Review Team (Kathy note: schedule bits only) Face to Face meeting, London, 19 to 20 January 2011 Tuesday, 18 January 2011 Arrival by members of the Whois Review Team. A location for evening drinks will be established at or near our hotel (further details to follow). Wednesday, 19 January 2011 - DAY 1 Full day F2F Meeting 09:30 - 18:00 - including lunch, and an nice evening dinner to follow (with Whois Team and ICANN Staff - we would be pleased if you would join us -- Location to be announced). Thursday, 20 January 2011 DAY 2 09:30 - 14:00 including lunch. Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. <ATT00001..txt> _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)<http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
Dear Sharon and all, It is not unusual that ICANN signs contracts, in fact, quite the contrary;-) - I copy this to Matt for his assessment of how quickly this can be done here. I realize that there seems to be a hard stop very soon from the hotel side and if the timing doesn't work for an ICANN-signed contract the alternative would be to provide an ICANN guarantee for the hotel bookings and thank you Sharon for front-ending the arrangement with the hotel. Thanks Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:52 AM To: emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk; bill.smith@paypal-inc.com Cc: belinda.shean@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Dear All, As ICANN do not sign contracts, I am going to undertake that on behalf of the group with the hotel.Obviously this comes with a liaibility to pay whatever happens and I need to do this early next week, so really do need to press on how many, and for how long. I am happy to accommodate you all as long as possible, as we have waited for a long time to meet and the subject matter and surrounding issues are very complex. I really hope this is going to be the solid foundation on which we build our work. So - very flexible this end - am keeping most of week clear to accomodate any special requests or travel arrangements - but need to now hotel numbers and dates by Monday. Have a good weekend, and happy travels to those travelling from Columbia. Best Wishes Sharon -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 December 2010 09:10 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels Dear all I've been reviewing these threads re: London. I appreciate the comments that have been made, and the work that Olof Alice and the staffers are doing on the logistics. Given that so few of us made it to Cartagena, I view the informal meeting up the night before as an important part of our team building. I can understand that travelling from Brussels may be possible on the morning, but hear what others say about the length of flights from other European destinations. Please can we extend an extra night in the hotel for members of the team who do not want to travel on the morning. I'm also looking at the agenda over the next day or two, and hear what the US contingent say about planning for 2 full days. Before Kathy and I take this on board - are there any comments in favour of the original plan, ie stopping around 1400 or 1500 to allow those with flights home to catch them. My usual experience of the last afternoon of meetings of this kind is that the group dwindles in size as people catch their planes. Any comments? On 8 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Smith, Bill wrote: Olof, I appreciate, support, and practice responsible spending. I think we also need to be respectful of individuals and what we might be asking them to do in the name of fiscal responsibility and the risks we are taking by asking people to arrive on the first day of our meeting and leave on the second. WIth that in mind, I believe we are under-estimating the number of hotel nights that we will need for a two-day meeting (or even the current proposal for a day and a half). While it may be possible for some to arrive in London the morning of our meeting, to do so may require them to secure very early morning flights or trains and we run the risk that those individuals will be delayed, perhaps significantly. I have attended meetings with very tight travel arrangements, but tend to do so only when absolutely necessary. Also, asking that we plan to leave London on the evening of our second day is impractical at best for some of us. Regards Bill On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Olof Nordling wrote: Hello Kathy, Our thinking was to be parsimonious with the budget and count on Europeans being able to reach London the same morning (like Alice and I have planned), especially since UK time adds a cushion of one hour for those in continental Europe. However, it's the Review Team's choice - and there is also a risk factor with counting on early morning flights into London in January (for obvious reasons like snow - 5 cm is enough to close Heathrow- and fog, as long as the EU hasn't harmonized European climate to Portuguese standards...) so yes, it is possible. All the best Olof From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:51 PM To: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen; Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: London trip -- dates Hi All, The agenda is still under review, but let me share with you the vision that we have, and the agenda overview that we are planning (below). It is modeled on the schedule of the PIR Board agenda (which works well for getting a lot of work done in a short time). Given the long day of the main meeting (Wednesday), it is central that people arrive the day before... and be fully rested and refreshed for our long day on Wed! Is that possible? Best, Kathy -------------------------------------------------- Agenda of the Whois Review Team (Kathy note: schedule bits only) Face to Face meeting, London, 19 to 20 January 2011 Tuesday, 18 January 2011 Arrival by members of the Whois Review Team. A location for evening drinks will be established at or near our hotel (further details to follow). Wednesday, 19 January 2011 - DAY 1 Full day F2F Meeting 09:30 - 18:00 - including lunch, and an nice evening dinner to follow (with Whois Team and ICANN Staff - we would be pleased if you would join us -- Location to be announced). Thursday, 20 January 2011 DAY 2 09:30 - 14:00 including lunch. Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. <ATT00001..txt> _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
Dear Olof Thank you for this clarification, which is most welcome. Kind regards Emily On 10 Dec 2010, at 14:08, Olof Nordling wrote:
Dear Sharon and all, It is not unusual that ICANN signs contracts, in fact, quite the contrary;-) – I copy this to Matt for his assessment of how quickly this can be done here. I realize that there seems to be a hard stop very soon from the hotel side and if the timing doesn’t work for an ICANN-signed contract the alternative would be to provide an ICANN guarantee for the hotel bookings and thank you Sharon for front-ending the arrangement with the hotel. Thanks Olof
From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:52 AM To: emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk; bill.smith@paypal-inc.com Cc: belinda.shean@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear All,
As ICANN do not sign contracts, I am going to undertake that on behalf of the group with the hotel.Obviously this comes with a liaibility to pay whatever happens and I need to do this early next week, so really do need to press on how many, and for how long.
I am happy to accommodate you all as long as possible, as we have waited for a long time to meet and the subject matter and surrounding issues are very complex. I really hope this is going to be the solid foundation on which we build our work.
So - very flexible this end - am keeping most of week clear to accomodate any special requests or travel arrangements - but need to now hotel numbers and dates by Monday.
Have a good weekend, and happy travels to those travelling from Columbia.
Best Wishes
Sharon -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 December 2010 09:10 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels
Dear all
I've been reviewing these threads re: London.
I appreciate the comments that have been made, and the work that Olof Alice and the staffers are doing on the logistics.
Given that so few of us made it to Cartagena, I view the informal meeting up the night before as an important part of our team building. I can understand that travelling from Brussels may be possible on the morning, but hear what others say about the length of flights from other European destinations.
Please can we extend an extra night in the hotel for members of the team who do not want to travel on the morning.
I'm also looking at the agenda over the next day or two, and hear what the US contingent say about planning for 2 full days.
Before Kathy and I take this on board - are there any comments in favour of the original plan, ie stopping around 1400 or 1500 to allow those with flights home to catch them. My usual experience of the last afternoon of meetings of this kind is that the group dwindles in size as people catch their planes.
Any comments? On 8 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Smith, Bill wrote:
Olof,
I appreciate, support, and practice responsible spending. I think we also need to be respectful of individuals and what we might be asking them to do in the name of fiscal responsibility and the risks we are taking by asking people to arrive on the first day of our meeting and leave on the second. WIth that in mind, I believe we are under-estimating the number of hotel nights that we will need for a two-day meeting (or even the current proposal for a day and a half).
While it may be possible for some to arrive in London the morning of our meeting, to do so may require them to secure very early morning flights or trains and we run the risk that those individuals will be delayed, perhaps significantly. I have attended meetings with very tight travel arrangements, but tend to do so only when absolutely necessary. Also, asking that we plan to leave London on the evening of our second day is impractical at best for some of us.
Regards
Bill
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Olof Nordling wrote:
Hello Kathy, Our thinking was to be parsimonious with the budget and count on Europeans being able to reach London the same morning (like Alice and I have planned), especially since UK time adds a cushion of one hour for those in continental Europe. However, it’s the Review Team’s choice – and there is also a risk factor with counting on early morning flights into London in January (for obvious reasons like snow – 5 cm is enough to close Heathrow- and fog, as long as the EU hasn’t harmonized European climate to Portuguese standards…) so yes, it is possible. All the best Olof
From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:51 PM To: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen; Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: London trip -- dates
Hi All, The agenda is still under review, but let me share with you the vision that we have, and the agenda overview that we are planning (below). It is modeled on the schedule of the PIR Board agenda (which works well for getting a lot of work done in a short time).
Given the long day of the main meeting (Wednesday), it is central that people arrive the day before… and be fully rested and refreshed for our long day on Wed! Is that possible?
Best, Kathy --------------------------------------------------
Agenda of the Whois Review Team (Kathy note: schedule bits only) Face to Face meeting, London, 19 to 20 January 2011 Tuesday, 18 January 2011 Arrival by members of the Whois Review Team. A location for evening drinks will be established at or near our hotel (further details to follow).
Wednesday, 19 January 2011 - DAY 1 Full day F2F Meeting 09:30 - 18:00 – including lunch, and an nice evening dinner to follow (with Whois Team and ICANN Staff – we would be pleased if you would join us -- Location to be announced).
Thursday, 20 January 2011 DAY 2 09:30 - 14:00 including lunch.
Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org> |
Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> |
Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
<ATT00001..txt>
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677.
All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk
Hi All, I have no authority to sign contracts and those that do are either in Cartagena or not in the office. Realistically, I do not think this can be accomplished by Monday (which is Sunday night/very early morning Monday morning my time). Everyone in Cartagena will just be returning home and it is quite likely that they will not come into the office on Monday. Alternatively, I think it would be best if I book the approved dates as "one offs" for each individual. This would mean that I would make the arrangements and pay for the rooms directly. The benefits of this scenario are: * Members would not have to be out of pocket (as an FYI, our Accounts Payable Departments takes up to 30 days to make a wire. There is then the issue of returns, holds, etc.); * Sharon and her organization do not need to make a guarantee for such a large amount of money; * I would be able to cancel rooms and receive a refund if members are unable to attend; * Hotel information could quickly be given to those who need it for visa purposes; and * I am able to book the rooms for less than quoted. One additional point to consider is the time frame we are working with (end of Cartagena, holidays, new years, etc.). If I book the rooms directly, I feel we would be able to accomplish this task mush more quickly. To be clear, this would just be lodging and not conference rooms. If you are in need of conference rooms I apologize but I am unable to assist. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thank you, Matt Ashtiani Constituency Travel Coordinator ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Tel: +1(310)823-9358 Dir: +1(310)578-8675 Fax: +1(310) 823-8649 Mob: +1(310) 892-3247 From: Olof Nordling Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 6:09 AM To: sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk; bill.smith@paypal-inc.com Cc: belinda.shean@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois@icann.org; Matt Ashtiani Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels Dear Sharon and all, It is not unusual that ICANN signs contracts, in fact, quite the contrary;-) - I copy this to Matt for his assessment of how quickly this can be done here. I realize that there seems to be a hard stop very soon from the hotel side and if the timing doesn't work for an ICANN-signed contract the alternative would be to provide an ICANN guarantee for the hotel bookings and thank you Sharon for front-ending the arrangement with the hotel. Thanks Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:52 AM To: emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk; bill.smith@paypal-inc.com Cc: belinda.shean@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Dear All, As ICANN do not sign contracts, I am going to undertake that on behalf of the group with the hotel.Obviously this comes with a liaibility to pay whatever happens and I need to do this early next week, so really do need to press on how many, and for how long. I am happy to accommodate you all as long as possible, as we have waited for a long time to meet and the subject matter and surrounding issues are very complex. I really hope this is going to be the solid foundation on which we build our work. So - very flexible this end - am keeping most of week clear to accomodate any special requests or travel arrangements - but need to now hotel numbers and dates by Monday. Have a good weekend, and happy travels to those travelling from Columbia. Best Wishes Sharon -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 December 2010 09:10 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels Dear all I've been reviewing these threads re: London. I appreciate the comments that have been made, and the work that Olof Alice and the staffers are doing on the logistics. Given that so few of us made it to Cartagena, I view the informal meeting up the night before as an important part of our team building. I can understand that travelling from Brussels may be possible on the morning, but hear what others say about the length of flights from other European destinations. Please can we extend an extra night in the hotel for members of the team who do not want to travel on the morning. I'm also looking at the agenda over the next day or two, and hear what the US contingent say about planning for 2 full days. Before Kathy and I take this on board - are there any comments in favour of the original plan, ie stopping around 1400 or 1500 to allow those with flights home to catch them. My usual experience of the last afternoon of meetings of this kind is that the group dwindles in size as people catch their planes. Any comments? On 8 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Smith, Bill wrote: Olof, I appreciate, support, and practice responsible spending. I think we also need to be respectful of individuals and what we might be asking them to do in the name of fiscal responsibility and the risks we are taking by asking people to arrive on the first day of our meeting and leave on the second. WIth that in mind, I believe we are under-estimating the number of hotel nights that we will need for a two-day meeting (or even the current proposal for a day and a half). While it may be possible for some to arrive in London the morning of our meeting, to do so may require them to secure very early morning flights or trains and we run the risk that those individuals will be delayed, perhaps significantly. I have attended meetings with very tight travel arrangements, but tend to do so only when absolutely necessary. Also, asking that we plan to leave London on the evening of our second day is impractical at best for some of us. Regards Bill On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Olof Nordling wrote: Hello Kathy, Our thinking was to be parsimonious with the budget and count on Europeans being able to reach London the same morning (like Alice and I have planned), especially since UK time adds a cushion of one hour for those in continental Europe. However, it's the Review Team's choice - and there is also a risk factor with counting on early morning flights into London in January (for obvious reasons like snow - 5 cm is enough to close Heathrow- and fog, as long as the EU hasn't harmonized European climate to Portuguese standards...) so yes, it is possible. All the best Olof From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:51 PM To: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen; Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: London trip -- dates Hi All, The agenda is still under review, but let me share with you the vision that we have, and the agenda overview that we are planning (below). It is modeled on the schedule of the PIR Board agenda (which works well for getting a lot of work done in a short time). Given the long day of the main meeting (Wednesday), it is central that people arrive the day before... and be fully rested and refreshed for our long day on Wed! Is that possible? Best, Kathy -------------------------------------------------- Agenda of the Whois Review Team (Kathy note: schedule bits only) Face to Face meeting, London, 19 to 20 January 2011 Tuesday, 18 January 2011 Arrival by members of the Whois Review Team. A location for evening drinks will be established at or near our hotel (further details to follow). Wednesday, 19 January 2011 - DAY 1 Full day F2F Meeting 09:30 - 18:00 - including lunch, and an nice evening dinner to follow (with Whois Team and ICANN Staff - we would be pleased if you would join us -- Location to be announced). Thursday, 20 January 2011 DAY 2 09:30 - 14:00 including lunch. Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org> | Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. <ATT00001..txt> _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
I also support the full 2-day meeting proposal as opposed to 1.5 or 1.75 days. Kim On 10 Dec 2010, at 07:52, <sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> <sharon.lemon@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear All,
As ICANN do not sign contracts, I am going to undertake that on behalf of the group with the hotel.Obviously this comes with a liaibility to pay whatever happens and I need to do this early next week, so really do need to press on how many, and for how long.
I am happy to accommodate you all as long as possible, as we have waited for a long time to meet and the subject matter and surrounding issues are very complex. I really hope this is going to be the solid foundation on which we build our work.
So - very flexible this end - am keeping most of week clear to accomodate any special requests or travel arrangements - but need to now hotel numbers and dates by Monday.
Have a good weekend, and happy travels to those travelling from Columbia.
Best Wishes
Sharon -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 December 2010 09:10 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] London Agenda and Hotels
Dear all
I've been reviewing these threads re: London.
I appreciate the comments that have been made, and the work that Olof Alice and the staffers are doing on the logistics.
Given that so few of us made it to Cartagena, I view the informal meeting up the night before as an important part of our team building. I can understand that travelling from Brussels may be possible on the morning, but hear what others say about the length of flights from other European destinations.
Please can we extend an extra night in the hotel for members of the team who do not want to travel on the morning.
I'm also looking at the agenda over the next day or two, and hear what the US contingent say about planning for 2 full days.
Before Kathy and I take this on board - are there any comments in favour of the original plan, ie stopping around 1400 or 1500 to allow those with flights home to catch them. My usual experience of the last afternoon of meetings of this kind is that the group dwindles in size as people catch their planes.
Any comments? On 8 Dec 2010, at 22:43, Smith, Bill wrote:
Olof,
I appreciate, support, and practice responsible spending. I think we also need to be respectful of individuals and what we might be asking them to do in the name of fiscal responsibility and the risks we are taking by asking people to arrive on the first day of our meeting and leave on the second. WIth that in mind, I believe we are under-estimating the number of hotel nights that we will need for a two-day meeting (or even the current proposal for a day and a half).
While it may be possible for some to arrive in London the morning of our meeting, to do so may require them to secure very early morning flights or trains and we run the risk that those individuals will be delayed, perhaps significantly. I have attended meetings with very tight travel arrangements, but tend to do so only when absolutely necessary. Also, asking that we plan to leave London on the evening of our second day is impractical at best for some of us.
Regards
Bill
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Olof Nordling wrote:
Hello Kathy, Our thinking was to be parsimonious with the budget and count on Europeans being able to reach London the same morning (like Alice and I have planned), especially since UK time adds a cushion of one hour for those in continental Europe. However, it’s the Review Team’s choice – and there is also a risk factor with counting on early morning flights into London in January (for obvious reasons like snow – 5 cm is enough to close Heathrow- and fog, as long as the EU hasn’t harmonized European climate to Portuguese standards…) so yes, it is possible. All the best Olof
From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:51 PM To: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen; Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: London trip -- dates
Hi All, The agenda is still under review, but let me share with you the vision that we have, and the agenda overview that we are planning (below). It is modeled on the schedule of the PIR Board agenda (which works well for getting a lot of work done in a short time).
Given the long day of the main meeting (Wednesday), it is central that people arrive the day before… and be fully rested and refreshed for our long day on Wed! Is that possible?
Best, Kathy --------------------------------------------------
Agenda of the Whois Review Team (Kathy note: schedule bits only) Face to Face meeting, London, 19 to 20 January 2011 Tuesday, 18 January 2011 Arrival by members of the Whois Review Team. A location for evening drinks will be established at or near our hotel (further details to follow).
Wednesday, 19 January 2011 - DAY 1 Full day F2F Meeting 09:30 - 18:00 – including lunch, and an nice evening dinner to follow (with Whois Team and ICANN Staff – we would be pleased if you would join us -- Location to be announced).
Thursday, 20 January 2011 DAY 2 09:30 - 14:00 including lunch.
Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org> |
Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org> | .ORG Blog<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> | YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> |
Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
<ATT00001..txt>
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677.
All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
participants (5)
-
Emily Taylor -
Kim G. von Arx -
Matt Ashtiani -
Olof Nordling -
sharon.lemon＠soca.x.gsi.gov.uk