Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft slide decks for ASO and SSAC
For our meetings tomorrow, here are some draft slides. Please let me know if you have any comments.
I'm aware that we don't have a set of slides for the registrars. Any suggestions?
Thank you for preparing the slides. May we add a question to the ccNSO, about sharing their knowledge about national (data protection) law? They already had lengthy experience with whois services in their countries, so they should can tell us which data is allowed to be collected and which data might be published (with restrictions). For the SSAC, the important question for me is, if whois is neccessary to the internet stability, which part of the information is relevant, an how can it verified as well as the service be proteced. For ASO, I'd like to know, how Ressouce Certificates might be applied to domain names, and their experience with hierachical thin whois structures. For ALAC, the following questions arise: * Please inform us about civil society acceptance of Whois services * Tell us about the privacy laws regarding Whois in your countries * Point us about usability problems (i.e. internationalization) * How does Whois help the consumer to trust the Internet We already had an discussion in late January on the Atlarge ML (archived). For all slides some minor point: - The consultations are on March, 15th. - The font on slide two is inconsistent, it's irritating. The URL of te whois wiki can bis shortend to ".../whoisreview/". - On slide four the subgroup of "producers and maintainers" is missing - The last slide four is confusing: The consultation with the groups is mixed with the call for comments The consultation with the groups is mixed with the community consultation I'd propose to copy my version of the last slide (incl. the stable URL). Thank you for the good work.
Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: [...]
For ASO, I'd like to know, how Ressouce Certificates might be applied to domain names, and their experience with hierachical thin whois structures.
Well, I don't mind confronting the ASO that question. But my feeling is that we should rather ask the names people (SSAC?) about their opinion regarding certificates? As I said already in private discussion, I fail see the direct relevance of the certification wrt the whois facility. Wilfried PS: could you please refrain from including the newsgroup ref.s from the mail headers? It breaks the reply-all...
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:54:50PM +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
For ASO, I'd like to know, how Ressouce Certificates might be applied to domain names, and their experience with hierachical thin whois structures.
Well, I don't mind confronting the ASO that question. But my feeling is that we should rather ask the names people (SSAC?) about their opinion regarding certificates?
As I said already in private discussion, I fail see the direct relevance of the certification wrt the whois facility.
You are right. I just present my thoughts, which are - as you know - driven by looking for alternatives to the whois system.
PS: could you please refrain from including the newsgroup ref.s from the mail headers? It breaks the reply-all...
Yes, I'll do so. Thank you for reminding me, that I break communictaion.
participants (2)
-
Lutz Donnerhacke -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet