Dear Review Team Members, For your convenience, please find enclosed the note pod content of your call held on 14 September. Kindly note that these are draft notes and that Staff will create a preliminary report. Please be kindly reminded that conference call material posted at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Call+20+-+14+September+2011 Thanks, Kind regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Reply-To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:08:51 -0700 To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Subject: Adobe Connect - Note Pod Content from WHOIS-Review AGENDA: Roll call & apologies Adopt agenda Welcome Seth Adopt preliminary report (1 September) Consumer study: progress & updates Chapters: Progress & updates. Review and adopt the MdR agenda Material: do we have all the material we need in anticipation of the MdR meeting? A.O.B PARTICIPANTS: Emily, Michael, Sharon, Bill, James, Kathy, Seth, Susan, Omar APOLOGIES : Peter, Lutz, Lynn,Olof NOTES: 1.Special welcome to Seth. Replacing Olivier Iteanu - Seth: difficulty to ingrate all the material. Attention in MdR will be focused on chapters. 2.Agenda adopted 3.Subject to (LG)'s confirmation, preliminary report is adopted. 4.(LG) independent research on consumer attitude, trust in relation to WHOIS. Expectations for MdR? KK Samard Susan Kim helped (LG) pinpointing countries that would be part of the survey. Survey company went ahead and began interviewing 20 individuals in the world. The videotaped interviews will be available to RT - These are preliminary interviews. What people are responding to. Survey company will be reporting to us. Slot on Wednesday morning. Outline of what happened during 1to1 interviews and draft material of what suggesting for questions. Presentation for that and discussion period to talk about questions - get them up and running for the next course of actions. 5.Chapters - (JB) update - comparing with KK - chance to review that and distribute Team before MdR. Thanks (SK) for sharing examples of WHOIS look-ups. (SK) added to (LG)'s consumer chapter. This is the framework we were looking for thanks (SK). (SK) Ebay - report on fraud. (SK) welcomes comments and wordsmithing. (KK) still representing Registries - minority groups - widen. (BS) questionning need for domain name owners if desire is to publish information and remain anonymous. - struggling with argument that any domain name owner can remain anonymous. All require identification. (ET) acknowledge both. right to privacy not the same as the right of anonymity. All of these comments take us back to something we agreed to do. the report should deal with the purpose of the WHOIS. Let's not lose track of that.. Would Susan's piece of work go into the body or annex? PN - Members haven't had time to review document externsively but (ET) noted: we don't have opposing arguments - domain-name should be more expensive (GAC meeting) - need to hear more from Registries and Registrars. (KK) - (JB) please help (PN) with pointers on that. Definitiong (SL) + (ET) - (BS) surprised at proposal + reference to Lawrence Strickling's comment: "why spend it so much time on definitions". Discussion have bene really helpful. (ET) proposal to rethink about those definitions in MdR - (SL) we need to agreed wether need those definitions or to stop now.. (ET) + (KK) the work is not wasted, the discussion is helpful (law enforcement questionnaire, led to compliance review, gap analysis). (KK) look forward to create definitions that community can use. (JB) make sure don't go too far down the road, set the boundaries. For MdR, (JB)'s draftl On journey to MdR, familiarize yourself with chapters, be ready to give editorial comment on each section. important that all comfortable with draft chapters as they are. reviewing policy not making it. 7. If get gap analysis right, recommendations should flow. (JB) preview of implementation before gap analysis. (JB) approach that can use to identify different categories of gap. Last working face-to-face before publish recommendations. Introduce policy and lead to details. 15-20 minutes. First 1./2 of the day to do work on policy and implementation. Dedicate morning to gap analysis and afternoon to recommendation. (KK) do we need a discussion of privacy laws. No outreach so far on privacy laws.. Article 29 group brief response? No - (BS) need to issue report.. (SK) understand (KK)'s concern but how should this be addressed? --> Liz Gasster 8. Draft recommendations by Dakar meeting. Hope to get this done by end of November