------------- (06/11/2018 22:06) -------------

Edmon: dennis/sarmad do you have the link handy?

Dennis Tan: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VCpLpl9nkHq7D7Pf0gyJm7zSllVC9pLvsu_7YdJ473Y/edit?usp=sharing

Edmon: thx

------------- (06/11/2018 22:16) -------------

Edmon: not sure if i understood sarmad correctly, but i think it might be useful to distinguish between "variants" such as netherlands vs. holland, and IDN variants that is defined by the LGR, in this case the RZ-LGR...

 ------------- (06/11/2018 22:17) -------------

Sarmad Hussain: "variants" are by definition those from RZ-LGR.  Others should be considered unique TLD labels?

------------- (06/11/2018 22:20) -------------

Dennis Tan: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-060-en.pdf

Mirjana Tasic .rs: I hear you

------------- (06/11/2018 22:30) -------------

Edmon: so 2 specific suggestions: 1. beofre a generation panel is reconvened, the issue raised should be compared with what was already discussed in the generation-integration panel decisions/discussions from before, it should only be reconvened if new information is brought in

------------- (06/11/2018 22:31) -------------

Edmon: 2. do we talk about appeal against integration panel itself and how it comes out with its consensus position

Sarmad Hussain: +1 Edmon

Sarmad Hussain: (on Edmon's first comment) :-)

Edmon: @sarmad understood, 2 was more of a question

Sarmad Hussain: IP position is generally explained

Sarmad Hussain: GP should be able to ask IP rationale for a decision

------------- (06/11/2018 22:45) -------------

Edmon: sorry, let me type then

------------- (06/11/2018 22:47) -------------

Edmon: suggestion is that whoever comes in with an appeal should present a technically coherent LGR (or part of LGR pertaining the lang/script) as a basic threshold

Dennis Tan: sounds like a reasonable ask

Edmon: yes agree with sarmad, we shoul dhave examples

Sarmad Hussain: Developing an LGR may be too technical for somebody who is appealing

Sarmad Hussain: especially from the community

Sarmad Hussain: Though the entity appealing must make their case

------------- (06/11/2018 22:52) -------------

Edmon: hmm sarmad, also we might want to distinguish between an update of the LGR initiated by a renewed generation panel vs. an "appeal"

Sarmad Hussain: good point.  GP can start at any time

Edmon: i guess i read appeal as a different thing, and for that we should set some tech bar, because a renewed GP can be convened for consideration of a number of codepoints without a particualr recommended change to the LGR already in place

Edmon: but an appeals should be otherwise

Sarmad Hussain: yes, agree

Wei WANG: I agree

------------- (06/11/2018 22:55) -------------

alireza: thanks

Mirjana Tasic .rs: Bye

Wei WANG: thanks