Tentative Scope of Work

The study group will address the following topics focused on applying the RZ-LGR for existing and future IDN TLDs from a technical perspective. As appropriate, the study group may add more relevant topics.

  1. Validation of future TLDs using RZ-LGR
  2. Definition of variant TLDs and their disposition based on RZ-LGR and whether policy could further reduce allocatable variant TLDs
  3. Application of RZ-LGR on reserved IDN TLD labels
  4. Harmonized application of RZ-LGR across IDN TLDs, including IDN gTLDs and IDN ccTLDs
  5. Remaining requirements of security and stability evaluation of future IDN TLDs by the DNS Stability Panel after applying RZ-LGR

*This study is not intended to review the RZ-LGR Procedure developed by the community and endorsed by the ICANN Board.

more details at: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-02-08-en

We are free to add more relevant topic, we can discuss this in details. 
 
 
Dr. Ajay DATA  | Founder & CEO 
Get email id like अजय@डाटा.भारत in your own language,
visit www.xgenplus.com 

From: Dessalegn Yehuala <mequanint.yehuala@gmail.com>  MailId : [80841574]
To: Dr Ajay Data <ajay@data.in>,rz-lgr-sg@icann.org
Subject: Re: Re : [RZ-LGR-SG] Some scope issues for deliberation
Date: 23 Apr 2018 07:56:04 PM

Wouldn`t it be good to think policy driven application -the application of LGRs within the limits of existing and future policies/ constraints at the start?   
 
Kind regards,
Dessalegn

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Dr Ajay Data <ajay@data.in> wrote:
I think, our scope is limited to whatever work has happened in LGR`s , we are looking for there "application" . Also there is no "character count" in labels is under discussion as of now for IDN TLD`s.

thanks. 
 
Dr. Ajay DATA  | Founder & CEO 
Get email id like अजय@डाटा.भारत in your own language,
visit www.xgenplus.com 

From: Dessalegn Yehuala <mequanint.yehuala@gmail.com>  MailId : [80839687]
To: "rz-lgr-sg@icann.org" <rz-lgr-sg@icann.org>
Subject: [RZ-LGR-SG] Some scope issues for deliberation
Date: 23 Apr 2018 05:52:48 PM

Dear All,
I was not able to attend the previous call due to the meeting tool limitation. I would like to bring to the SG`s attention a few scope related issues- as it stands two letters alphabet-based  ASCII labels are reserved for ccTLD, will this also be remain the case in IDN? 
 
Is the study group also scoped to address issues related to the use of geo or territory names for U-Label-based  TLDs?
 
Kind regards,
Dessalegn
_______________________________________________
RZ-LGR-SG mailing list
RZ-LGR-SG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rz-lgr-sg

Do not Remove:
[HID]20180423175248376[-HID]