Hi kc,

I’m not sure where you are seeing a mismatch - the progress spreadsheet seems aligned with the comment spreadsheet as far as I can tell. In the example you pointed to, “Baseline security practices” is item 22 on both. Unless you’re looking at the spreadsheet row number instead of the first column with the recommendation number?

Thanks,
Heather

Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human
https://sphericalcowconsulting.com
On Jun 27, 2020, 10:54 PM -0700, k claffy <kc@caida.org>, wrote:


The progress chart numbering of recommendations
doesn't match the public comment numbering:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DQpPA0aLDsW5IHLKgQqHtW-5860CKGCuTYIOeMPEaaw/edit#gid=925648260,
e.g., "Baseline security practices" is 23 in the progress chart
and 22 in the public comment spreadsheet

so this is confusing..

anyway i put my proposed changes in the Changes column
of the spreadsheet for all recs w my name next to them.

unfortunately i cannot attend the call this week,
NSF-related conflict. (yes russ this means you can
delete all recommendations with my name on them! ;) )

seriously, i will try to catch up with laurin later in the
week, or happy to discuss by email.

is there a working revised draft and if so can someone
send the URL? i can put proposed revised text into that doc.

k


On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:21:45PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
Rapporteurs:

Please update this progress chart:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cOZ1lPXqHfuZNt68zvB5xRB63eBoL3gonDbhDuHEx7k/edit#gid=0 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cOZ1lPXqHfuZNt68zvB5xRB63eBoL3gonDbhDuHEx7k/edit#gid=0>

In addition, please put together a plan to report to the full SSR2 RT on or before 1 July 2020. If a subteam is unable to report by that time, the fullt review team will discuss whether to augment the subteam or drop the recommendation.

Russ


On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

KC observed that the energy in the SSR2 RT is quite low. She suggested that a deadline be set for the Subteams to complete their work, and that a failure to meet the deadline means that the recommendation does not have adequate support from the team to remain in the report. Since about half of the team was not on the call, I want to raise this suggestion on the mail list. The team leadership will discuss this suggestion on Monday, so please provide your thoughts on the mail list by Sunday.

Russ


_______________________________________________
Ssr2-review mailing list
Ssr2-review@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
Ssr2-review mailing list
Ssr2-review@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.