Dear Geoff: This is not an SSR2 meeting. A few of us are hanging out near the Registration Desk. We’re discussing tagging action items and what we had for dinner last night.
Come join us. And, again, understand that this is not an SSR2 meeting.
The next SSR2 meeting is at 1:00 with the Board – they called it without a lot of notice and it’s closed. We’ve asked twice that they make sure remote Team members can join. If you have an issue with due notice about this meeting, please take it up with the Board.
Best,
Denise
Denise Michel
Domain Name System Strategy & Management
Facebook, Inc.
On 11/2/17, 10:42 AM, "Geoff Huston" <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
I am sorry to sound like a broken record Denise, but calling a SSR2 meeting with ZERO notice is yet another instance of my issues with this leadership style. I would like to request some level of due notice and efforts for inclusion of all team members on the part of leadership, as without it I believe that you cannot subsequently represent any outcome as being representative in any form or fashion of the SSR2 team.
As I have already noted here, my conversations with the SSAC chairs last night indicated that there was no expectation of any subsequent communication from SSR2 so I am confused that there are different reports of outcomes from presumably the same meeting. Perhaps this is illustrative of the perils of undertaking such informal “get togethers” as becoming a source of further dysfunctionality rather than resolving them.
Geoff
> On 2 Nov 2017, at 10:16 am, Denise Michel <denisemichel@fb.com> wrote:
>
> To work on info request for some SSAC members
>
> Denise Michel
> Sent via phone
> ______________________________
_________________ > Ssr2-review mailing list
_______________________________________________
Ssr2-review mailing list
Ssr2-review@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review