Alain:

I must say that I am a bit confused by your note.

First, we talked about the reading at the face-to-face meeting in August.  So, by this time, I hope that all RT members have read the SSR-related part of the ICANN Bylaws, the SSR1 report, the SSR1 implementation report, the ICANN Strategic plan, and the ICANN SSR framework.

Second, I would expect the person that signed up to facilitate the discussion of a particular SSR1 recommendation has reviewed the context in the SSR1 report.  Others should do the same.

Third, you point out the three focus areas in the SSR1 report.  Are you suggesting this provides a better order for us to cover the recommendations?  If so, I think the unanswered questions is forcing us to skip some for the time being.  If not, then I did not understand your point at all; please try again.

Russ


On Oct 4, 2018, at 2:35 AM, ALAIN AINA <aalain@trstech.net> wrote:

This mail below did not get the expected  traction.  But once again, i want  to emphazise the followings:

1- we should not be taken the recommendations without referring  to their context  in the SSR1 report

2- The SSR1 recommendations are related to the  3 focus areas  below used by the SSR1 team  for their review

3- it is therefore  important that we make sure everybody read the SSR1 report, the 28 recommendations implementation report,  but also the ICANN Strategic plan, the ICANN SSR framework  which are  influenced by the implementation of some the SSR1 recommendations.

Hope this helps

—Alain

Begin forwarded message:

From: ALAIN AINA <aalain@trstech.net>
Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] Please review the first 5 SSR1 recommendations for the call tomorrow
Date: 13 September 2018 at 13:15:16 GMT
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: ICANN SSR2 <ssr2-review@icann.org>

Russ,

On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:31, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

Last week, we talked about the information that we need to collect in a table.  I put together a template for the table, and asked the vice chairs to review it.  Attached is the resulting structure for the table.  At this point, I invite the whole review team to review it.  Is there anything that we need to capture that this does not capture?


To ease the comprehension and the assessment  of the recommendations and their implementation, it may be good to add to the table the  focus area and may be sub-focus area of the recommendation.

The SSR1  used 3 focus area:

1- Scope and Structure of ICANN’s SSR Responsibilities

2- Effectiveness and Implementation of the SSR Framework. 

3- Understanding the Risk Landscape and Contingency Planning