Hi Denise,
Per your request to provide more information on where we are seeking clarity on your questions (on the rec 11 and 12 briefing), please see inline comments below. Thanks!
5. The SSR1 review team called out a number of activities that were operational and within staff’s purview and contained in the SSR framework and called for implementation of measurements and metrics. Was
that work done and is it captured anywhere? To clarify, as part of the SSR1 report related to rec 11, the SSR1 review team noted ICANN administration of the new gTLD Program, IDN program, significant SSR related issues that are in the framework. They called
for more specific goals, measurements and impact assessment. Was that work done and is it captured somewhere else?
We are seeking clarification about the last two sentences of the paragraph. Are these goals and measurements that the community has provided to ICANN Org?
6. Is there more information on the steps that ICANN has taken in the past five years to facilitate data access and activities that involved other entities that had ownership or responsibilities on related
activities?
We’re just not clear on what this question is asking.
9. ‘Addressing SSR practices in MOUs’ links to a page that holds all of the MOUs. Can you provide some quantification of SSR-related practices in MOUs and more information on which ones contain SSR-related
practices, which practices they contain, and how all that’s tracked or the implementation is assessed?
We have provided a list of all SSR-related relationships, below, with various entities. Some of these SSR-related items are contractually bound, e.g. Registry and Registrar contracts. We are unclear on
what data you’re looking for us to quantify.
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssr-relationships-fy17-23jan17-en.pdf
--
Jennifer Bryce
Senior Reviews Coordinator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: jennifer.bryce@icann.org
Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
www.icann.org
From: <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce@icann.org>
Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 1:24 PM
To: SSR2 <SSR2-review@icann.org>
Subject: [Ssr2-review] Clarification required: SSR1 briefing questions
Hi all,
Regarding action item 101 assigned to ICANN Org: “Provide responses to questions on SSR1 briefing:
Recommendations 11, 12.”
The following questions require some clarification.
Denise, perhaps as the asker you could provide this clarity.
5. The SSR1 review team called out a number of activities that were operational and within staff’s purview and contained in the SSR framework and called for implementation of measurements and metrics. Was
that work done and is it captured anywhere? To clarify, as part of the SSR1 report related to rec 11, the SSR1 review team noted ICANN administration of the new gTLD Program, IDN program, significant SSR related issues that are in the framework. They called
for more specific goals, measurements and impact assessment. Was that work done and is it captured somewhere else?
6. Is there more information on the steps that ICANN has taken in the past five years to facilitate data access and activities that involved other entities that had ownership or responsibilities on related
activities?
9. ‘Addressing SSR practices in MOUs’ links to a page that holds all of the MOUs. Can you provide some quantification of SSR-related practices in MOUs and more information on which ones contain SSR-related
practices, which practices they contain, and how all that’s tracked or the implementation is assessed?
Thanks,
Jennifer
--
Jennifer Bryce
Senior Reviews Coordinator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: jennifer.bryce@icann.org
Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
www.icann.org