Dear all,
As discussed:
Here is the link to the Review Team’s Terms of Reference, adopted in May 2017:
https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Terms+of+Reference?preview=/64076120/64948210/SSR2-TermsofReference-CLEAN%20v4.0%20ET.docx
Operations of the review team, including decision making and roles and responsibilities of team members/leadership is on pages 5-7. Pasted below.
Operation of the Review Team
Decision Making
Section 4.6. of ICANN’s Bylaws states:
SPECIFIC REVIEWS (iii) – “Review team decision-making practices shall be specified in the Operating Standards, with the expectation that review teams shall try to operate on a consensus basis. In the event
a consensus cannot be found among the members of a review team, a majority vote of the members may be taken.”
In accordance with this article of the Bylaws the SSR2-RT has agreed, by consensus, that it will strive to make its decisions on a consensus basis. This means that all Team members agree on a position, or
only a small minority of Team members disagree, but most agree. To the extent that the SSR2-RT is unable to achieve consensus with respect to any recommendations, its reports and recommendations will include minority views.[1]
Decisions of the SSR2-RT will be made at meetings, either face-to- face or via teleconference (teleconference or Adobe), and via the SSR2-RT’s email list, as requested by the Co-Chairs.
Leadership
At its meeting on March 22 2017 the SSR2-RT selected by consensus Denise Michel, Emily Taylor and Eric Osterweil as Co-Chairs.
Responsibilities of the Co-Chairs include:
Responsibilities of SSR2-RT members include:
--
Jennifer Bryce
Senior Reviews Coordinator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: jennifer.bryce@icann.org
Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
www.icann.org
[1]
The nature and use of consensus and minority views are informed by the “GNSO Working Group Guidelines”