Dear all,

 

As discussed:

 

Here is the link to the Review Team’s Terms of Reference, adopted in May 2017: https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Terms+of+Reference?preview=/64076120/64948210/SSR2-TermsofReference-CLEAN%20v4.0%20ET.docx

 

Operations of the review team, including decision making and roles and responsibilities of team members/leadership is on pages 5-7. Pasted below.

 

Operation of the Review Team

Decision Making

 

Section 4.6. of ICANN’s Bylaws states:

SPECIFIC REVIEWS (iii) – “Review team decision-making practices shall be specified in the Operating Standards, with the expectation that review teams shall try to operate on a consensus basis. In the event a consensus cannot be found among the members of a review team, a majority vote of the members may be taken.”

 

In accordance with this article of the Bylaws the SSR2-RT has agreed, by consensus, that it will strive to make its decisions on a consensus basis. This means that all Team members agree on a position, or only a small minority of Team members disagree, but most agree. To the extent that the SSR2-RT is unable to achieve consensus with respect to any recommendations, its reports and recommendations will include minority views.[1]

 

Decisions of the SSR2-RT will be made at meetings, either face-to- face or via teleconference (teleconference or Adobe), and via the SSR2-RT’s email list, as requested by the Co-Chairs.

 

Leadership

 

At its meeting on March 22 2017 the SSR2-RT selected by consensus Denise Michel, Emily Taylor and Eric Osterweil as Co-Chairs.

 

Responsibilities of the Co-Chairs include:

 

 

Responsibilities of SSR2-RT members include:

 

 

 

-- 

Jennifer Bryce

Senior Reviews Coordinator 

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

Email: jennifer.bryce@icann.org

Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann

www.icann.org



[1] The nature and use of consensus and minority views are informed by the “GNSO Working Group Guidelines