Hi KC,
Yes. We will log your request in the system and proceed to look into feasible times for this presentation with the relevant SMEs.
Kind regards,
--
Negar
From: Ssr2-review <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of k claffy <kc@caida.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 1:52 PM
To: "ssr2-review@icann.org" <ssr2-review@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] DAAR etc.
Denise, okydok.
Dear Staff, can this count as this question/request,
that we add to whatever is being logged?
in related news, i learned that drc will presesnt a
DAAR update to SSAC's admin committee call this week,
i'll try to attend or get minutes from that call
and summarize what i learned.
k
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:16:51PM +0000, Denise Michel wrote:
> Hi, KC.
>
>
>
> I think your suggestion of a DAAR<https://www.icann.org/octo-ssr/daar> update is a good one, and suggest you send staff a question on the status and expected posting date. This can be logged in SSR2 questions and we can track the response.
>
>
>
> It???s relevant to issues involving both SSR1 implementation and internal and external SSR2 issues.
>
>
>
> Through the Business Constituency, I have been following DAAR and related reports from their inception, and the BC has received several "it's on its way" updates on DAAR over the years. I don???t recall anything since Abu Dhabi, however.
>
>
> (Separate from DAAR) On your question about the registry constituency comments on ICANN???S implementation of the CCCT Review abuse-related recommendation, they are in-line with both the registry and registrar groups??? historic position of minimizing ICANN/ICANN Compliance???s ability to get data from registrars and registries relating to DNS abuse. It???s not a position that several other ICANN groups share.
>
> Best,
> Denise
>
>
>
>
>
> Denise Michel
>
> Director, Domain Name System Strategy & Management
>
> Facebook, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ???On 11/22/18, 9:24 AM, "Ssr2-review on behalf of k claffy" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of kc@caida.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> all,
>
>
>
> i've been reviewing transcripts from meetings last year
>
> and wonder if it's possible to get an update from ICANN
>
> on the DAAR system? more than a year has gone by and i
>
> wonder if the thinking/use/analysis/impact has evolved at all.
>
> or is there an updated web page i should be reading?
>
> e.g., there is a line from steve that says:
>
>
>
> The current status as far as I know is that, again, I
>
> think were having a session in Abu Dhabi to start
>
> determining what the community wants to see out of it
>
>
>
> [ do we know what the outcome of that conversation was? ]
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
> what we want to do is we want to make it a better place
>
> out there for the consumers, not necessarily say, Well,
>
> this registrar or registry is a bad actor, and because
>
> all these other people are bad, that doesnt necessarily
>
> make them the bad actor.
>
> ...
>
>
>
> Whether or not theres going to be a plan, Id have to
>
> get back to the various departments and see.
>
>
>
>
>
> here is the report from that meeting:
>
>
>
>
> which seems to have more questions than answers in it.
>
> i wonder if this is a reasonable place for this subgroup
>
> to re-start?
>
>
>
> also i wonder if anyone is following:
>
>
>
>
> and in particular RySG's comment on it at the bottom.
>
> not surprising, but, any thoughts? this seems like
>
> something we should be considering..
>
>
>
> k
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ssr2-review mailing list
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ssr2-review mailing list