Re: [Ssr2-review] [EXT] Re: for SSR2 team member review and edit
Dear team I’m traveling back from trinidad tomorrow so won’t be able to join the call. Apologies Sincerely, Kerry-Ann Barrett Cybersecurity Policy Specialist Organization of American States On Oct 1, 2019, at 11:49 PM, Matogoro Jabera <jaberamatogoro@gmail.com<mailto:jaberamatogoro@gmail.com>> wrote: CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER Dear Russ, I support the phrasing as it was given in our comment. If budget is the main constrain then the board could approve the recommendation BUT the implementation could remain pending up to next budget when fund will be made available. We could also give a paragraph analysing the approved, pending and rejected recommendations. It could happen that the approved recommendations favour a certain group at ICANN ecosystem. So it is better also to give a small highlights on these. Regards, Matogoro On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, 01:11 Russ Housley, <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote: Denise and Matogoro: I have some concern with this one sentence: The correct response to budgetary concerns (based on past Board action) would have been for the Board to approve the recommendations and note that implementation would begin in the new fiscal year. I agree with the direction that this is going, but I think it would be better for the Board action to include the implementation of the recommendation in the proposed budget for the following fiscal year, and then have the community review process of the budget determine whether or not the necessary funds are allocated. Russ _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Team, I am sorry, due to some technical issue I am not able to join the call, Apologies. Regards Ram Krishna
On Oct 2, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Barrett, Kerry-Ann <KABarrett@oas.org> wrote:
Dear team
I’m traveling back from trinidad tomorrow so won’t be able to join the call. Apologies
Sincerely, Kerry-Ann Barrett Cybersecurity Policy Specialist Organization of American States
On Oct 1, 2019, at 11:49 PM, Matogoro Jabera <jaberamatogoro@gmail.com <mailto:jaberamatogoro@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER
Dear Russ,
I support the phrasing as it was given in our comment. If budget is the main constrain then the board could approve the recommendation BUT the implementation could remain pending up to next budget when fund will be made available.
We could also give a paragraph analysing the approved, pending and rejected recommendations. It could happen that the approved recommendations favour a certain group at ICANN ecosystem. So it is better also to give a small highlights on these.
Regards, Matogoro
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, 01:11 Russ Housley, <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote: Denise and Matogoro:
I have some concern with this one sentence:
The correct response to budgetary concerns (based on past Board action) would have been for the Board to approve the recommendations and note that implementation would begin in the new fiscal year.
I agree with the direction that this is going, but I think it would be better for the Board action to include the implementation of the recommendation in the proposed budget for the following fiscal year, and then have the community review process of the budget determine whether or not the necessary funds are allocated.
Russ
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org <mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Barrett, Kerry-Ann -
Ramkrishna Pariyar