A question regarding the decrease in delegation of new gTLDs
Hello all, In the Name Collision section, the RT states the following: "However, it is important to note that decrease of traditional reporting mechanisms of name collisions may not be seen as absence of name collisions. Rather, the SSR2 Review Team believes that it could be because the nature of occurrence of name collisions might have been changed as well as the decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years." I’d like to point to something where a reader can verify that there has been a decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years. The original draft text did not include a pointer to anything that backs up this statement. I had thought to point to https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics, but as far as I can tell, that site does not offer insight into the rate of delegation over time. The page is a rather strange combination of current data, updated monthly, and stats from 2012-2013, and nothing in between. Am I looking at the right place for this kind of data? Does anyone have any better data to cite? Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com
That site tells us that there are still 9 that are in process. The graph here: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/timelines might be helpful. Russ
On Dec 10, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Heather Flanagan <hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com> wrote:
Hello all,
In the Name Collision section, the RT states the following:
"However, it is important to note that decrease of traditional reporting mechanisms of name collisions may not be seen as absence of name collisions. Rather, the SSR2 Review Team believes that it could be because the nature of occurrence of name collisions might have been changed as well as the decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years."
I’d like to point to something where a reader can verify that there has been a decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years. The original draft text did not include a pointer to anything that backs up this statement. I had thought to point to https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics>, but as far as I can tell, that site does not offer insight into the rate of delegation over time. The page is a rather strange combination of current data, updated monthly, and stats from 2012-2013, and nothing in between.
Am I looking at the right place for this kind of data? Does anyone have any better data to cite?
Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com <https://sphericalcowconsulting.com/>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
So, it’s a decrease because there are only 9 left out of the original 1930 that were requested? And no more can be asked for until there is a new New gTLD program? Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com On Dec 10, 2020, 9:43 AM -0800, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, wrote:
That site tells us that there are still 9 that are in process.
The graph here: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/timelines might be helpful.
Russ
On Dec 10, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Heather Flanagan <hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com> wrote:
Hello all,
In the Name Collision section, the RT states the following:
"However, it is important to note that decrease of traditional reporting mechanisms of name collisions may not be seen as absence of name collisions. Rather, the SSR2 Review Team believes that it could be because the nature of occurrence of name collisions might have been changed as well as the decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years."
I’d like to point to something where a reader can verify that there has been a decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years. The original draft text did not include a pointer to anything that backs up this statement. I had thought to point to https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics, but as far as I can tell, that site does not offer insight into the rate of delegation over time. The page is a rather strange combination of current data, updated monthly, and stats from 2012-2013, and nothing in between.
Am I looking at the right place for this kind of data? Does anyone have any better data to cite?
Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Correct, no more can be applied for until New gTLD ++. Russ
On Dec 10, 2020, at 12:46 PM, Heather Flanagan <hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com> wrote:
So, it’s a decrease because there are only 9 left out of the original 1930 that were requested? And no more can be asked for until there is a new New gTLD program?
Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com <https://sphericalcowconsulting.com/> On Dec 10, 2020, 9:43 AM -0800, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, wrote:
That site tells us that there are still 9 that are in process.
The graph here: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/timelines <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/timelines> might be helpful.
Russ
On Dec 10, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Heather Flanagan <hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com <mailto:hlf@sphericalcowconsulting.com>> wrote:
Hello all,
In the Name Collision section, the RT states the following:
"However, it is important to note that decrease of traditional reporting mechanisms of name collisions may not be seen as absence of name collisions. Rather, the SSR2 Review Team believes that it could be because the nature of occurrence of name collisions might have been changed as well as the decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years."
I’d like to point to something where a reader can verify that there has been a decrease in the delegation of new gTLDs in recent years. The original draft text did not include a pointer to anything that backs up this statement. I had thought to point to https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics>, but as far as I can tell, that site does not offer insight into the rate of delegation over time. The page is a rather strange combination of current data, updated monthly, and stats from 2012-2013, and nothing in between.
Am I looking at the right place for this kind of data? Does anyone have any better data to cite?
Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com <https://sphericalcowconsulting.com/>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org <mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Heather Flanagan -
Russ Housley