Reminder! Heather has made a lot of edits to this part of the report. Please review. Please put comments and suggestions (not edits) in the document. Russ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Oct 19, 2020, 6:51 PM -0700

Hello all,

I’ve done some significant editing on the SSR1 Recommendation section, removing all the embedded recommendations (except for SSR1 Rec 6, but more on that below) and putting in pointers to the relevant SSR2 Recommendations that cover the topic of the SSR1 Recommendation.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hgz9Zd2A7TLoc1UjDNZ4W756YqCP8JrPNLrGeNjN... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hgz9Zd2A7TLoc1UjDNZ4W756YqCP8JrPNLrGeNjN...>

There are still some significant flaws, in particular:

There is a systemic assumption that if the recommendation is relevant but only partially implemented, then it did not achieve its intended effect. I have no idea if that’s always true or not, because I don’t know what SSR2 thinks the intended effect was supposed to be. There are not enough citations for many of the statements made in the rationale.

Regarding SSR1 Recommendation 6, that’s the only one I was unable to determine which SSR2 Recommendation was supposed to cover that topic (roles and responsibilities for SSAC/RSSAC). I have sent Russ an email asking for clarification on what I should do with this one.

I know that members of the Abuse sub team are not likely to have time to review this right now, but hopefully others on this ReviewTeam will be able to put some time in this week on this section. This section is a necessary part of our report; your feedback is necessary to make sure we have consensus on the text.

Thanks!

Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human sphericalcowconsulting.com <https://sphericalcowconsulting.com/>