All, At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2
Dear Bernard, Thank you for the sharing. It is a good starting point for the RT. Regards, Matogoro Sent from Windows Mail From: Bernard Turcotte Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 5:24 PM To: SSR2 Review Team Email List All, At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2
Thanks Bernie! Cathy Cathy Handley Executive Director Government Affairs American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) Mobile: +1 703 341 7996 Fax: +1 703 263 0111 Email: chandley@arin.net<mailto:chandley@arin.net> Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete.. Thank you. On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>> wrote: All, At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
Hi Bernie Many thanks for preparing and circulating this draft. @SSR2 team members, please review the draft carefully as we will go through it on the next call. But in anticipation of that call, it would be good for us to use the list to surface some of the issues. Here are a few questions which I hope will help stimulate discussion, but please don't feel constrained by it. If you'd like to raise any other issue relating to the draft, please do. - Note the extensive quotations from the sections of ICANN's bylaws which set out ICANN's SSR responsibilities. What impact will this have on the way we interpret our scope? - Review the brainstorming outputs. To what extent do you think they belong in this document? - Review the proposed timeline, is this realistic? - Is there anything missing? - Do you want to raise any queries or concerns about the text? Best wishes Emily On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
-- Emily Taylor CEO, Oxford Information Labs *Associate Fellow, Chatham House; Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy* *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS AND CONTACTS AS OF 1 JANUARY 2017* Magdalen Centre, Oxford OX4 4GA | T: 01865 582885 E: emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk | D: 01865 582811 | M: +44 7540 049322 <http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> Registered office: 37 Market Square, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6RE. Registered in England and Wales No. 4520925. VAT No. 799526263 .
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones. I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“ Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption? kind regards, Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
Geoff, To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion. Thanks for noting the addition for the list. Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gih@apnic.net> wrote: Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones. I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“ Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption? kind regards, Geoff Huston > On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting. > > Bernard Turcotte > ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 > <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ > Ssr2-review mailing list > Ssr2-review@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
PFA my redline. -James On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of karen.mulberry@icann.org> wrote:
Geoff,
To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN
On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gih@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“
Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study
One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
kind regards,
Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
Hi James and Geoff Thank you for your comments, and Karen, thank you for your confirmation that staff are happy to be used as a resource. To all members of the SSR2 team, please review the draft and consider the comments of team members. Bernie/Karen, would it be possible to share again on the list the full output from our brainstorming session, so that we can remind ourselves of all the comments made, and where the areas of consensus and contention are. Best Emily On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:55 PM, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
PFA my redline.
-James
On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of karen.mulberry@icann.org> wrote:
Geoff,
To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN
On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gih@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“
Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study
One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
kind regards,
Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte < turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>________
Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
-- Emily Taylor CEO, Oxford Information Labs *Associate Fellow, Chatham House; Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy* *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS AND CONTACTS AS OF 1 JANUARY 2017* Magdalen Centre, Oxford OX4 4GA | T: 01865 582885 E: emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk | D: 01865 582811 | M: +44 7540 049322 <http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> Registered office: 37 Market Square, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6RE. Registered in England and Wales No. 4520925. VAT No. 799526263 .
Hi all, Per the request below, please find attached the ICANN58 brainstorming capture document, also available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64076120 Best, Jennifer From: <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk> Date: Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 10:03 AM To: James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> Cc: "SSR2-review@icann.org" <SSR2-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] SSR2-RT TermsofReference - Initial Draft Hi James and Geoff Thank you for your comments, and Karen, thank you for your confirmation that staff are happy to be used as a resource. To all members of the SSR2 team, please review the draft and consider the comments of team members. Bernie/Karen, would it be possible to share again on the list the full output from our brainstorming session, so that we can remind ourselves of all the comments made, and where the areas of consensus and contention are. Best Emily On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:55 PM, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net>> wrote: PFA my redline. -James On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of karen.mulberry@icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org>> wrote:
Geoff,
To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN
On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of gih@apnic.net<mailto:gih@apnic.net>> wrote:
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“
Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study
One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
kind regards,
Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review -- Emily Taylor CEO, Oxford Information Labs Associate Fellow, Chatham House; Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS AND CONTACTS AS OF 1 JANUARY 2017 Magdalen Centre, Oxford OX4 4GA | T: 01865 582885 E: emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk> | D: 01865 582811 | M: +44 7540 049322 [https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/static.oxil/oxil_logo-150x.png] [https://docs.google.com/a/oxil.co.uk/uc?id=0B7sS_6djDxsHNm92d21jM21HMDQ&expo...] <http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> Registered office: 37 Market Square, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6RE. Registered in England and Wales No. 4520925. VAT No. 799526263 .
Thank you James, Please find my comments and suggestions in addition to James comments, in the attached file. All the best, Kaveh.
On 5 Apr 2017, at 18:55, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
PFA my redline.
-James
On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of karen.mulberry@icann.org> wrote:
Geoff,
To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN
On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gih@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“
Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study
One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
kind regards,
Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
I’ve added additional comments and edits in the attached. I suggest we focus our efforts (and discussions) on the “scope of work” part of the document, which needs a great deal of work ;) Best, Denise Denise Michel Domain Name System Strategy & Management Facebook, Inc. denisemichel@fb.com<mailto:denisemichel@fb.com> From: <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar@board.icann.org> Date: Friday, April 7, 2017 at 6:04 AM To: SSR2 <SSR2-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] SSR2-RT TermsofReference - Initial Draft Thank you James, Please find my comments and suggestions in addition to James comments, in the attached file. All the best, Kaveh.
On 5 Apr 2017, at 18:55, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
PFA my redline.
-James
On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of karen.mulberry@icann.org> wrote:
Geoff,
To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN
On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gih@apnic.net> wrote:
Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“
Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study
One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
kind regards,
Geoff Huston
On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2 <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li... <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
participants (10)
-
Bernard Turcotte -
Cathy Handley -
Denise Michel -
Emily Taylor -
Geoff Huston -
jaberamatogoro＠gmail.com -
James Gannon -
Jennifer Bryce -
Karen Mulberry -
Kaveh Ranjbar