Dear James, I also propose the same. However, ICANN Remits and ICANN Mission still requires RT to consider to each sub-group. In fact, I am struggling to understand this delimitation as our Review Work is concerned. One more, suggestion: RT sit together as a group to identify ICANN Remit and Scope of ICANN Mission to each of the sub-group. I should also congratulate all the SSR2 RT and ICANN Staff supporting this team for the step made so far. We are heading to the right direction. Team spirit and commitment for each RT will lead us to good end with Recommendation that will help ICANN as organization to move to next level. Regards, Matogoro On 6/23/17, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:

Might I suggest that we put some slot into the schedule to discuss a response to this item?

On 23 Jun 2017 5:27 p.m., Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar@board.icann.org> wrote: Dear SSR2 Review team,

Please find attached the Board’s input and comments to the SSR2 Review team on the Terms of Reference. These comments are in the spirit of the board resolution and bylaws that also appointed me to the Review team (see: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2017-02-03-en#1.g).

We hope you find these to be useful, and look forward to positive ongoing discussions with the SSR2.

I look forward to the upcoming Face-to-Face meeting.

Kind regards, Kaveh.

_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review

-- MATOGORO Jabhera Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania College of Informatics and Virtual Education The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)