Proposed update to the workplan
Dear SSR2 Review Team: On the plenary call a few minutes ago, I shared a proposed timeline for the SSR2 report. It was: - produce the recommendations and rationale for each recommendation by the ICANN meeting in Montreal in early November; - share recommendations with the community during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; - have a face-to-face meeting in January to address the feedback received during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; and - release the draft report for public comment in late January or early February. No one on the call saw any obstacles to meeting this timeline. Does anyone that could not make the call see any? Russ
I think given past rate of progress it's an aggressive timeline. I don't see any obstacles, but I didn't see any of the previous obstacles that slowed us down. So I support targeting this timeline. k On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:22:19AM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
Dear SSR2 Review Team:
On the plenary call a few minutes ago, I shared a proposed timeline for the SSR2 report. It was:
- produce the recommendations and rationale for each recommendation by the ICANN meeting in Montreal in early November;
- share recommendations with the community during the ICANN meeting in Montreal;
- have a face-to-face meeting in January to address the feedback received during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; and
- release the draft report for public comment in late January or early February.
No one on the call saw any obstacles to meeting this timeline. Does anyone that could not make the call see any?
Russ _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Russ, I support the timeline and let us hope that no obstacle will affect the plan. Regards, Matogoro On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, 17:22 Russ Housley, <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
Dear SSR2 Review Team:
On the plenary call a few minutes ago, I shared a proposed timeline for the SSR2 report. It was:
- produce the recommendations and rationale for each recommendation by the ICANN meeting in Montreal in early November;
- share recommendations with the community during the ICANN meeting in Montreal;
- have a face-to-face meeting in January to address the feedback received during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; and
- release the draft report for public comment in late January or early February.
No one on the call saw any obstacles to meeting this timeline. Does anyone that could not make the call see any?
Russ _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Russ, I missed the call for some last minute commitment. I see no new obstacles. We would have done the work from June 2018 to January 2019. Serious works in front of us. —Alain
On 17 Jul 2019, at 14:22, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
Dear SSR2 Review Team:
On the plenary call a few minutes ago, I shared a proposed timeline for the SSR2 report. It was:
- produce the recommendations and rationale for each recommendation by the ICANN meeting in Montreal in early November;
- share recommendations with the community during the ICANN meeting in Montreal;
- have a face-to-face meeting in January to address the feedback received during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; and
- release the draft report for public comment in late January or early February.
No one on the call saw any obstacles to meeting this timeline. Does anyone that could not make the call see any?
Russ _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
ALAIN AINA -
k claffy -
Matogoro Jabera -
Russ Housley