Follow-up Q for Anne
Dear Anne, There was a section in the Handbook where you had suggested we add some examples of eligible entities that might wear multiple hats and that the Handbook should be clear that the applicant could submit documentation pertaining to multiple entity types. The updated language is below along with the proposed examples. As this was your suggestion, the IRT advised that we reach out to confirm this updated text adequately addresses your comment. The text is pasted below or you can go directly to Section 5.5 via this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w3_kYNYcEjXin5D1O9x4hxcpYJr7JqlY/edit#he... 5.5 Eligible Entities Note that the categories for eligible entities identified below are not mutually exclusive. Should the ASP applicant fit into multiple eligible categories, the applicant is encouraged to submit required documentation for all applicable eligibility categories, so they may be evaluated accordingly. Note however, ASP applicants are only required to meet the eligibility criteria and indicators for one of the eligible entity categories listed to qualify under this criteria category (Eligible Entities). Submitting documentation for multiple entity types does not negatively impact the applicant’s eligibility (i.e., if an applicant submits documentation for two entity categories and qualifies for one but does not qualify for another, the applicant still passes the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category). See additional examples below. Applicant Example 1: if the applicant is a nonprofit/charitable organization and an Indigenous/Tribal Peoples organization, it may submit documentation to demonstrate eligibility for either entity or for both entities. The applicant only needs to meet the criteria and indicators for one entity type to pass the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category. Applicant Example 2: if the applicant is a small business social enterprise and is principally located in a developing economy, it may submit documentation to demonstrate eligibility for either entity or for both entities. The applicant only needs to meet the criteria and indicators for one entity type to pass the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category. Kind regards, Kristy
Looks good to me! Thanks for sending. Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:18 PM Kristy Buckley <kristy.buckley@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Anne,
There was a section in the Handbook where you had suggested we add some examples of eligible entities that might wear multiple hats and that the Handbook should be clear that the applicant could submit documentation pertaining to multiple entity types. The updated language is below along with the proposed examples. As this was your suggestion, the IRT advised that we reach out to confirm this updated text adequately addresses your comment. The text is pasted below or you can go directly to Section 5.5 via this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w3_kYNYcEjXin5D1O9x4hxcpYJr7JqlY/edit#he...
*5.5 Eligible** Entities *
Note that the categories for eligible entities identified below are not mutually exclusive. Should the ASP applicant fit into multiple eligible categories, the applicant is encouraged to submit required documentation for all applicable eligibility categories, so they may be evaluated accordingly. Note however, ASP applicants are only required to meet the eligibility criteria and indicators for one of the eligible entity categories listed to qualify under this criteria category (Eligible Entities). Submitting documentation for multiple entity types does not negatively impact the applicant’s eligibility (i.e., if an applicant submits documentation for two entity categories and qualifies for one but does not qualify for another, the applicant still passes the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category). See additional examples below.
Applicant Example 1: if the applicant is a nonprofit/charitable organization and an Indigenous/Tribal Peoples organization, it may submit documentation to demonstrate eligibility for either entity or for both entities. The applicant only needs to meet the criteria and indicators for one entity type to pass the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category.
Applicant Example 2: if the applicant is a small business social enterprise and is principally located in a developing economy, it may submit documentation to demonstrate eligibility for either entity or for both entities. The applicant only needs to meet the criteria and indicators for one entity type to pass the “Eligible Entity” evaluation category.
Kind regards, Kristy
participants (2)
-
Anne ICANN -
Kristy Buckley