Thanks Elisa. Regarding the CPE RFP, I think it's important to distinguish between potential providers who are able to supply a new panelist to review a challenge to the denial of CPE and those who do not have that capability. There is no realistic chance that a panel or panelist reviewing his/her/their own decision assigning a failing score could examine that denial in an objective manner.

It's just not that hard to hire a consulting panelist for that purpose who possesses the same credentials as we expect from the original.

Thank you,

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese

GNSO Councilor

NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026

anneicanngnso@gmail.com

On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:12 AM Elisa Busetto via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

We are pleased to inform you that we have published a tentative timeline for the Next Round Requests for Quotations (RFQs), Requests For Information (RFIs), and Requests For Proposals (RFPs): https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/en/resources/sourcingtimeline

Best regards,

Elisa

_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.