Bottom line - I think the IRT needs to see the revised language in both Name Collisions and Applicant Journey before these go out for public comment.

There was a robust discussion on the Name Collisions language and Rubens is correct that this spills over into Applicant Journey somewhat.  My main concern with respect to Applicant Journey is that, as I understand it from NCAP participation and from Jim Galvin's very detailed explanation to Elisa directly, every string will undergo Temporary Delegation and that will occur beyond the initial six month time frame for initial risk assessment.

Jeff believes that if a string is shown to be high risk in the initial assessment, it will not undergo Temporary Delegation, but Jim points out that you can't develop a reasonable mitigation plan without the data that is developed in Temporary Delegation.  All this affects time frames for processing the application.

Thanks,
Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
anneicanngnso@gmail.com


On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:13 AM Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> wrote:
And just to add quickly. The team heard the feedback during last wee’s sessions and so those will be addressed - where possible - in the drafts that will go out for public comment. 

On Feb 10, 2025, at 12:08, Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> wrote:


Thank you, Anne. 
We can make some last minute space on Thursday if you like. But I’d like to hear from others. This will likely take time from our discussions post public comment in April and early May. 
My understanding is that the proposed language reflects what’s recommended. And so from my viewpoint we would clean up the documents and publish for comment. 
Best. Lars 



On Feb 10, 2025, at 00:53, Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:


HI Lars and Elisa,

I don't think that Applicant Journey or Name Collisions sections are ready to go out for public comment without further review/discussion by the IRT.  I realize we are trying to meet deadlines but the last sessions on these two drafts raised important issues that need to be resolved and I think in the long run, it will take less time to resolve them first before public comment.

Not sure where others stand on this?

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.