Thank you for providing this rationale.  As one of the former co-chairs of the SubPro PDP Working Group, I believe the rationale here is sound and makes sense especially in light of the IDN ePDP Phase 1 Recommendation.   Though I am not sure there are any rules or procedures necessarily governing this situation, I am of the view that because (i) the IDN ePDP was a “Recommendation” as opposed to the SubPro’s “Implementation Guidance” and (ii) the IDN ePDP Phase 1 occurred more recently, that the IDN ePDP Phase 1 recommendation should be followed where, like here, there is a possible conflict.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Founder & CEO

JJN Solutions, LLC

+1.202.549.5079

Jeff@jjnsolutions.com

---

From: SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Next Round Policy Implementation <NextRound_PolicyImplementation@icann.org>
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 10:55 AM
To: subpro-irt@icann.org <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Rationale for Not Implementing Implementation Guidance 25.3

 

Dear IRT members,

 

We are please to inform you that the Rationale for Not Implementing Implementation Guidance 25.3 of SubPro is published on the Meeting #30 wiki page. We will discuss it during the meeting tomorrow.

 

Best regards,

Elisa

 

_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT mailing list
SubPro-IRT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/subpro-irt

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.