Thank you for sharing. Please note my updated email address.
All - the first thing ICANN org mentions in its response is that no differentiation in fees will be applied to an application with pre-evaluated RSP vs without. This is at odds with the SubPro discussions and outputs, where the RSP pre-evaluation was expected
to considerably reduce duplication of effort and streamline processing, and reduce costs, reflected in lower fees for applicants selecting a pre-evaluated RSP. Dusting down the over 3-year old Final Report, this is referred to under Implementation Guidance
15.2.
Whilst I respect the IRT is not responsible for setting fees, I think ICANN org will be challenged to justify this stance and deviation from the implementation guidance in the Final Report.
Is anyone else surprised with this or other elements in ICANN org’s reply?
Kind regards,
Martin
Martin Sutton
Co-Founder, TLDz
martin@tldz.com
+44 (0)7774 556680
TLDz.com
<attachment.png>
Illumiati
Limited. 77 Camden Street Lower, Dublin, D02 XE80
The
contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent,
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying,
or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
On 2 May 2024, at 10:25, Elisa Busetto <elisa.busetto@icann.org> wrote:
Dear IRT members,
In the
ICANN78
Policy Outcomes Report, it was noted that “[a]s information for the ICANN Board, the CPH can prepare a list of the decisions and work that need to be done by a potential applicant”.
In this context, we would like to inform you that on 29 February 2024 the RySG shared with ICANN org a
letteroutlining
the “list of the decisions that potential new gTLD applicants need to make in determining whether of not to apply for a new gTLD”, to which ICANN org
responded on
23 April 2024.
Best regards,
Elisa
_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT
mailing list
SubPro-IRT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/subpro-irt
_______________________________________________
By
submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).
You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.