Hi Justine,

 

Thank you for your kind feedback and for taking the time to leave comments on the google doc. We will review and discuss your comments in today’s call. If any of the raised points require additional follow-up with our team, we will be sure to circle back with you afterward.

 

Best Regards,

 

Ilana Licassi

Research Specialist, New gTLD Program: Support

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 

 

 

From: Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2026 at 4:55 AM
To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>, Ilana Licassi <ilana.licassi@icann.org>
Cc: "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Draft PICDRP FAQs- Requested Review

 

Hello Ilana, Ariel,

My apologies for this late response. As I am unable to join Call #174, I have instead posted, for consideration, some comments / questions in the relevant Googledoc shared by Ilana, in response to the request for feedback. 

I also wanted to say that the draft that has been put out is so much more informative than the existing scant information on PICDRPs. And yes, please use a similar approach when developing FAQs for RRDRP and TM-PDDRP.

Thank you!


Kind regards,
Justine

 

 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 at 00:10, Ariel Liang via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> wrote:

Hello all,

 

To supplement Ilana’s message – the FAQs on dispute resolution procedures after delegation are also mentioned in Section 1.2.17 of the AGB: https://newgtldprogram-2026-agb.icann.org/en/5-module-1-the-applicant-journey.html#dispute-resolution-procedures-after-delegation [newgtldprogram-2026-agb.icann.org]

 

We look forward to your general feedback on this set of FAQs, per Ilana’s message below.

 

Thank you,

Ariel  

 

From: Ilana Licassi via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Reply-To: Ilana Licassi <ilana.licassi@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 6:56 PM
To: "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Draft PICDRP FAQs- Requested Review

 

Dear IRT members,

 

I am sharing a draft set of PICDRP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) developed as an implementation of Recommendation 33.2, which requested “clearer, more detailed, and better-defined guidance on the scope of the procedure, the role of all parties, and the adjudication process must be publicly available”.

The purpose of this FAQ is to distill the relevant Applicant Guidebook (AGB) content into a more accessible and user-friendly format for future applicants and members of the general public. These FAQs are intended to improve clarity and usability of the information and are planned for publication on the new G website.

To support your review, we have:

 

We are seeking general feedback on:

 

1.    Whether this FAQ, as drafted, implements the level of detail and clarity requested in Recommendation 33.2, and

2.    Whether a similar approach could be used when developing FAQs for RRDRP and TM-PDDRP.

We kindly ask that you review this draft FAQ in advance so that we can walk through your feedback in an upcoming IRT call. We look forward to your feedback and will reach out soon to schedule this call.

Kind Regards,

 

Ilana Licassi

_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.