Ruben’s,

I’m not sure what you mean. If you mean they already paid the application them that is separate, especially if you have to option to enter the raffle or not. 


Best regards,

Marc H. Trachtenberg
Chair, Internet, Domain Name, eCommerce, and Social Media Practice
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Trac@gtlaw.com
(773) 677-3305
 
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 2:28 PM
To: trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com <trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com>
Cc: lars.hoffmann@icann.org <lars.hoffmann@icann.org>; elisa.busetto@icann.org <elisa.busetto@icann.org>; subpro-irt@icann.org <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [SubPro-IRT] [Ext] RE: Re: Order of Application Processing and the Prioritization Draw
 
*EXTERNAL TO GT*


Unless they are trying to establish that the value of the raffle is 10 dollars instead of USD 220k. Because there is an entry fee either way. 




Rubens




Em 16 de dez. de 2024, à(s) 15:14, trachtenbergm--- via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> escreveu:

There cannot be provisions in the law that require paid entry.  It is the opposite –  there are requirements that only start to apply when there is paid entry.  So having a raffle without a required entry fee would avoid those obligations and issues.
 
Marc H. Trachtenberg
Shareholder
Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice
Greenberg Traurig, LLP 
77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601 
T +1 312.456.1020



Best regards,

Marc H. Trachtenberg
Chair, Internet, Domain Name, eCommerce, and Social Media Practice
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Trac@gtlaw.com
(773) 677-3305
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.