Rubens,

 

What California law are you referring to and what does it not allow for anyone?

 

Best regards,

 

Marc H. Trachtenberg
Shareholder

Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601
T +1 312.456.1020

M +1 773.677.3305
trac@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com  |  View GT Biography

 

Greenberg Traurig Logo

 

 

From: SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 8:01 AM
To: subpro-irt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [SubPro-IRT] Topic 19: Application Queuing

 

*EXTERNAL TO GT*

 



Em 20 de fev. de 2024, à(s) 10:07, trachtenbergm--- via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> escreveu:

 

Alex,

 

I think we agree that no “draw” is needed and just randomized assignment of priority for those who elect to be prioritized through the applicant portal.  But from there your way again seems to be overcomplicated.  The simplest method would be for ICANN to just use a randomizer but I know people distrust ICANN so I suggest a reputable third party to do the randomization and then the results can be announced.  I agree no slot trading.

 

California law has no specific bias on trusting ICANN or not, they simply do not allow it for anyone. 

 

 

Rubens

 

 

 

 

If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.