Hi Anne,

 

Thanks for this comment. I think one solution may be to remove “sole organizing body” as a requirement for full points under Criterion 4. Instead, to get full points on Criterion 4, you must show majority support. In this way, an applicant that is not the “sole organizing body” does not lose points in both places.

 

To be clear, the reason for awarding such applicants those points is because being the “sole organizing body” is the clearest indicator of an applicant’s connection to/support from the identified community.

 

But, as “sole organizing body” is inherently more related to Criterion 1 on Community Establishment/organization and given concerns regarding double-counting, we can remove that as a requirement for Criterion 4, as noted above.

 

Thank you

Jared

 

 

 

From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, April 26, 2025 at 12:53
To: Jared Erwin <jared.erwin@icann.org>
Cc: "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated CPE AGB Language

 

Hi Jared,

I'm not sure of the best way to put this comment in the CPE document so I am sending it to you and the list.

 

In the current CPE draft, there appears to be double counting of a possible negative factor  in contravention of the Sub Pro Final Report, i.e. references to "Sole organizing body" (and associated scoring) in both Criterion 1 Organization and Criterion 4 Community Endorsement.  The Sub Pro Implementation Guidance states:

 

 

Implementation Guidance 34.10: The following text included in the 2012 Applicant Guidebook Section 4.2.3 Community Priority Evaluation Criteria should also be incorporated into the CPE Evaluation Guidelines: “The sequence of the criteria reflects the order in which they will be assessed by the panel. The utmost care has been taken to avoid any "double-counting" - any negative aspect found in assessing an application for one criterion should only be counted there and should not affect the assessment for other criteria.”

 

Thus, it appears as though an applicant who is not the "sole organizing body" loses points on that basis twice and that was not supposed to happen in this round.  How can we alleviate this "double-counting" issue?

 

Thank you,

Anne 

 

 

 

 

Anne Aikman-Scalese

GNSO Councilor

NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026

 

 

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:27 AM Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> wrote:

Hi all,

 

As a reminder, following our discussion on Tuesday, please review the CPE draft and provide any comments on the google (redline) document linked below.

 

We will also begin work on updating based on the IRT’s feedback ahead of our next call on this topic on 29 April 2025. I understand there were also questions on CPE/Community Registration Policies on the call yesterday, and we will make sure any updates made in relation to Topic 9 will also be reflected in the CPE section, as needed/relevant.

 

Thank you

Jared

 

From: Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Reply-To: Jared Erwin <jared.erwin@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 10:40
To: "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Updated CPE AGB Language

 

Dear IRT Members,

 

For our call today, 15 April 2025, at 18:00 UTC, here are the links to the updated CPE Language:

 

 

Thank you and speak with you soon.

 

Best

Jared

 

 

-- 

 

Jared Erwin

Director, New gTLD Program

Global Domains & Strategy

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

jared.erwin@icann.org

 

 

_______________________________________________
SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.