My primary question in case I can’t attend tomorrow is why do we need to include the requirement to purchase a ticket? This is where the legal risk comes from, in particular with respect to the draw being deemed an illegal lottery and/or requiring a permit. I am fine with the concept of a priority draw and making it optional – but there should be no cost to purchasing a ticket. It should not cost much to operate the draw and there will be plenty of application fee money to cover whether incremental cost there is for this. Marc H. Trachtenberg Shareholder Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice Greenberg Traurig, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601 T +1 312.456.1020 M +1 773.677.3305 trac@gtlaw.com<mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com> | www.gtlaw.com<http://www.gtlaw.com/>  |  View GT Biography <https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/t/trachtenberg-marc-h> [Greenberg Traurig Logo] [cid:image002.png@01DB4FA8.72A0C340] From: Elisa Busetto via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 9:14 AM To: subpro-irt@icann.org Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Order of Application Processing and the Prioritization Draw *EXTERNAL TO GT* Dear all, Please find here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1T5Gap0fzeOTWN...> the proposed language for “Order of Application Processing and the Prioritization Draw”. A pdf version of the document is posted on tomorrow’s meeting page<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/community.icann.org/x/gwEiFg__;!!DUT_TFPx...>. Best regards, Elisa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.