Good catch Anne, the slide deck still mentions "conflict with" which indeed is better if replaced by "contradict". Rubens

Em 25 de jul. de 2024, à(s) 15:46, Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> escreveu:

As mentioned in Tuesday's meeting, the word "conflict' should be changed to "contradict" for all the reasons mentioned in that discussion in open comments and in the chat. Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024 anneicanngnso@gmail.com <mailto:anneicanngnso@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:18 AM Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote:

...

On the RVCs discussion happening in a few minutes, I suggest changing "Proposed RVCs must not conflict with ICANN agreements and policies [wording TBD]"

To

"Proposed RVCs must not conflict with ICANN bylaws, agreements and policies."

Bylaws are the first reference an applicant should look at to assess whether ICANN would be able to sign up to an RVC, and the content restriction one specific case of such conflicts preventing ICANN from moving forward.

Rubens

_______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org>

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.