Re: Updated Fee FAQ
Thanks Marika, One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ- “The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.” “For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main (including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC, and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“ The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ? Thanks for clarifying. Elaine From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT, Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list. If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items. Best regards, Marika
I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price. -Jothan On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT < subpro-irt@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks Marika,
One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ-
“The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per *RSP applicant*.”
“For this evaluation fee, an *organization* may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main
(including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC,
and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“
The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ?
Thanks for clarifying.
Elaine
*From: *Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> *Reply-To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> *Date: *Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM *To: *"subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ
*Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear IRT,
Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list.
If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items.
Best regards,
Marika _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Jothan, I believe Elaine’s point was about it not being described in the FAQ. I don’t think Org is trying to change that late in game. Rubens
Em 23 de ago. de 2024, à(s) 15:50, Jothan Frakes via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> escreveu:
I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price.
-Jothan
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote:
Thanks Marika,
One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ-
“The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.”
“For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main
(including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC,
and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“
The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ?
Thanks for clarifying.
Elaine
From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear IRT,
Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list.
If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items.
Best regards,
Marika
_______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hello Elaine, Jothan and Rubens, An RSP applicant pays one RSP fee (max $92K) regardless of how many types (i.e., Main, DNS, DNSSEC, Proxy) the RSP applicant wants to be evaluated for. Nothing has changed regarding the RSP fee model we explained in our previous presentations to the community (e.g., the CP summit). Thank you for the questions. We will clarify the wording regarding the RSP fee in future communications/web pages. Regards, Gustavo ________________________________ From: Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 12:02 PM To: Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ Jothan, I believe Elaine’s point was about it not being described in the FAQ. I don’t think Org is trying to change that late in game. Rubens Em 23 de ago. de 2024, à(s) 15:50, Jothan Frakes via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> escreveu: I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price. -Jothan On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote: Thanks Marika, One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ- “The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.” “For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main (including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC, and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“ The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ? Thanks for clarifying. Elaine From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT, Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list. If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items. Best regards, Marika _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Another question on this document. For the fees for conditional or elective evaluations that are excluded from the general gTLD evaluation, can we assume that that these will be priced on a cost recovery basis as well? If so, that should be specified. Additionally, we should see calculations and assumptions and math that are being used to determine these fees. Marc H. Trachtenberg Shareholder Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice Greenberg Traurig, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601 T +1 312.456.1020 M +1 773.677.3305 trac@gtlaw.com<mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com> | www.gtlaw.com<http://www.gtlaw.com/> | View GT Biography <https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/t/trachtenberg-marc-h> [Greenberg Traurig Logo] [cid:image002.png@01DB05C9.4DF26C20] From: Gustavo Lozano Ibarra via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 2:43 PM To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>; subpro-irt@icann.org Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ *EXTERNAL TO GT* Hello Elaine, Jothan and Rubens, An RSP applicant pays one RSP fee (max $92K) regardless of how many types (i.e., Main, DNS, DNSSEC, Proxy) the RSP applicant wants to be evaluated for. Nothing has changed regarding the RSP fee model we explained in our previous presentations to the community (e.g., the CP summit). Thank you for the questions. We will clarify the wording regarding the RSP fee in future communications/web pages. Regards, Gustavo ________________________________ From: Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 12:02 PM To: Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ Jothan, I believe Elaine’s point was about it not being described in the FAQ. I don’t think Org is trying to change that late in game. Rubens Em 23 de ago. de 2024, à(s) 15:50, Jothan Frakes via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> escreveu: I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price. -Jothan On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote: Thanks Marika, One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ- “The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.” “For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main (including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC, and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“ The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ? Thanks for clarifying. Elaine From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT, Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list. If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items. Best regards, Marika _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrQv4LADo$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrMPaUzG8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrQv4LADo$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrMPaUzG8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
Thanks, Marc, that is indeed a correct assumption (cost recovery) and yes, we will come back to the IRT with the expected costs for these evaluations and assumptions behind those. Best regards, Marika From: trachtenbergm--- via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Reply-To: "trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com" <trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com> Date: Friday, 13 September 2024 at 17:41 To: Gustavo Lozano Ibarra <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>, "rubensk@nic.br" <rubensk@nic.br>, "subpro-irt@icann.org" <subpro-irt@icann.org> Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ Another question on this document. For the fees for conditional or elective evaluations that are excluded from the general gTLD evaluation, can we assume that that these will be priced on a cost recovery basis as well? If so, that should be specified. Additionally, we should see calculations and assumptions and math that are being used to determine these fees. Marc H. Trachtenberg Shareholder Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice Greenberg Traurig, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601 T +1 312.456.1020 M +1 773.677.3305 trac@gtlaw.com<mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com> | www.gtlaw.com<http://www.gtlaw.com/> | View GT Biography <https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/t/trachtenberg-marc-h> [Greenberg Traurig Logo] [cid:image002.png@01DB0605.4525CD30] From: Gustavo Lozano Ibarra via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 2:43 PM To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>; subpro-irt@icann.org Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ *EXTERNAL TO GT* Hello Elaine, Jothan and Rubens, An RSP applicant pays one RSP fee (max $92K) regardless of how many types (i.e., Main, DNS, DNSSEC, Proxy) the RSP applicant wants to be evaluated for. Nothing has changed regarding the RSP fee model we explained in our previous presentations to the community (e.g., the CP summit). Thank you for the questions. We will clarify the wording regarding the RSP fee in future communications/web pages. Regards, Gustavo ________________________________ From: Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 12:02 PM To: Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ Jothan, I believe Elaine’s point was about it not being described in the FAQ. I don’t think Org is trying to change that late in game. Rubens Em 23 de ago. de 2024, à(s) 15:50, Jothan Frakes via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> escreveu: I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price. -Jothan On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote: Thanks Marika, One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ- “The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.” “For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main (including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC, and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“ The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ? Thanks for clarifying. Elaine From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT, Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list. If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items. Best regards, Marika _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrQv4LADo$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrMPaUzG8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org<mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrQv4LADo$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!Ab_pwqFag5hc8vcQ-Nqm8YS7HK-A_IvqNNKvR8AofvdSohNkCuwjYZVCP-Zwqowk6zjFUhw53adHJNCrMPaUzG8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. ________________________________ If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
Considering the outrageous RSP fee, cost recovery is no assurance of a reasonable fee. It just means that the cost, high or not, will be passed over to applicant. Rubens
Em 13 de set. de 2024, à(s) 12:49, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> escreveu:
Thanks, Marc, that is indeed a correct assumption (cost recovery) and yes, we will come back to the IRT with the expected costs for these evaluations and assumptions behind those.
Best regards,
Marika
From: trachtenbergm--- via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: "trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com <mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com>" <trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com <mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com>> Date: Friday, 13 September 2024 at 17:41 To: Gustavo Lozano Ibarra <gustavo.lozano@icann.org <mailto:gustavo.lozano@icann.org>>, "rubensk@nic.br <mailto:rubensk@nic.br>" <rubensk@nic.br <mailto:rubensk@nic.br>>, "subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ
Another question on this document. For the fees for conditional or elective evaluations that are excluded from the general gTLD evaluation, can we assume that that these will be priced on a cost recovery basis as well? If so, that should be specified. Additionally, we should see calculations and assumptions and math that are being used to determine these fees.
Marc H. Trachtenberg Shareholder Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice Greenberg Traurig, LLP 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601 T +1 312.456.1020 M +1 773.677.3305 trac@gtlaw.com <mailto:trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com> | www.gtlaw.com <http://www.gtlaw.com/> | View GT Biography <https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/t/trachtenberg-marc-h>
<image001.png> <image002.png>
From: Gustavo Lozano Ibarra via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 2:43 PM To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br <mailto:rubensk@nic.br>>; subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ
*EXTERNAL TO GT*
Hello Elaine, Jothan and Rubens,
An RSP applicant pays one RSP fee (max $92K) regardless of how many types (i.e., Main, DNS, DNSSEC, Proxy) the RSP applicant wants to be evaluated for.
Nothing has changed regarding the RSP fee model we explained in our previous presentations to the community (e.g., the CP summit).
Thank you for the questions. We will clarify the wording regarding the RSP fee in future communications/web pages.
Regards, Gustavo
From: Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 12:02 PM To: Jared Erwin via SubPro-IRT Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Updated Fee FAQ
Jothan,
I believe Elaine’s point was about it not being described in the FAQ. I don’t think Org is trying to change that late in game.
Rubens
Em 23 de ago. de 2024, à(s) 15:50, Jothan Frakes via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> escreveu:
I seem to recall that the 92k was presented in an "all you can eat" spirit, where the RSP applicant could select one or more of the services in any combination at the same price.
-Jothan
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, 10:00 AM Pruis, Elaine via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> wrote:
Thanks Marika,
One clarification that isn’t super obvious in the FAQ-
“The RSP evaluation fee has been established at a maximum of USD $92,000 per RSP applicant.”
“For this evaluation fee, an organization may be evaluated as one or more types of RSP1: 1) Main (including support for optional additional Registry Services and IDN tables), 2) DNS, 3) DNSSEC, and 4) Proxy. A successfully evaluated RSP may provide services to more than one gTLD.“
The intention is to say the organization (is this the same as an RSP applicant?) only pays one (max $92k) fee regardless of how many “Types” for which an RSP applicant is trying to be evaluated (main RSP + DNS + Proxy) ?
Thanks for clarifying.
Elaine
From: Marika Konings via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Reply-To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 23, 2024 at 12:49 AM To: "subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>" <subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SubPro-IRT] Updated Fee FAQ
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT,
Please find attached the updated fee FAQ. Following further input from the Board, it was agreed to use the 1,500 applications scenario to set the gTLD evaluation fee. As you are aware, there are still two placeholders that need to be resolved before the final gTLD evaluation fee can be determined, namely the pending IDN EPDP Phase 1 recommendations as well as the SSAC advice on NCAP2. It is the expectation that the Board will address these two topics during its September workshop which would allow us to confirm the final gTLD evaluation fee following that. Note that in addition to confirming the 1,500 applications scenario, the FAQ also includes some further updates to address the different questions that were received during the ICANN80 sessions and/or mailing list.
If there are further questions that need clarification in the FAQ, please feel free to flag those. We expect to come back to the IRT with further details once the ICANN Board has addressed the two placeholder items.
Best regards,
Marika _______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPx...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list -- subpro-irt@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to subpro-irt-leave@icann.org <mailto:subpro-irt-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!DUT_TFPx...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com <mailto:postmaster@gtlaw.com>, and do not use or disseminate the information.
participants (6)
-
Gustavo Lozano Ibarra -
Jothan Frakes -
Marika Konings -
Pruis, Elaine -
Rubens Kuhl -
trachtenbergm＠gtlaw.com