Hello AJ,
My Apologies for come back with you late, I totally disagree with you urgings and it actually clarify nothing here is truth.
I am still waiting for the remaining replies on the term appointment and other issues raised for Secretary General and its members of Secretariat
Hello Everyone,
There have been lot of talks about Ambassador program since last few months and this promoted us to learn more about the Ambassador program, particularly its rationale , process adopted, expected outcome etc. So here are some of the answers we are able to collect, which probably will explain queries about UAA for all of us.
Answer : We made an announcement to the UA-Discuss list. We published a Help Wanted Ad (which is still open), https://uasg.tech/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/UA-Ambassadors-18-01-15.pdf which was done on January 15th 2018
Answer: Criteria is in the Help Wanted ad shown above.
Answer: https://uasg.tech/2018/04/introducing-the-first-ua-ambassadors/ on 25 April 2018
Answer: The Secretary General took the applications, assessed them and prepared a recommendation for the Coordination Group. If the Secretary General didn’t know a person they would check with the ICANN GSE team who could provide advice. Only members of the UASG Coordination Group were involved.
Answer: The list of UA Ambassadors is shown here: https://uasg.tech/people/ Harish, Abdalmonem, Ashish, Elaine, and Dusan were in the first group. John Levine joined early on. Mark Datysgeld only recently. Tobias came after the Puerto Rico meeting and resigned recently. We haven’t been keeping a registry.
Answer: We’ve not discussed this. It’s certainly our expectations and hope that people will continue. We put the year tenure in to the program to allow easy exit if things didn’t work out. As it is volunteer role, we wanted a commitment for at least 12 months and expected it to continued till terminated.
Answer: They should provide the Secretary General with a quarterly report. In practice they let the SG know what they’re doing while they’re doing it. A draft annual report has been prepared. We’re not grading individual ambassadors. These are volunteers, they generally do not cost us much, and we see value in keeping them engaged.
Answer: Under performance is a challenging term. We have heard complaints only of about one of the Ambassadors and have reached out to people that we know who have said that their performance is good. The attacks on this one ambassador have been ongoing since before the Barcelona meeting. This ambassador has risen to the occasion anytime they were called on and we are grateful for their continued participation and the support they get from their employer.
The Secretary General talks from time to time with each of the ambassadors. This usually includes us identifying opportunities and them identifying opportunities. (It is usually the ambassadors that are seeking opportunities) We sometimes get requests from them that aren’t appropriate and we don’t go further. The SG often checks with the local GSE team.
Answer:
We’ve received 10 applications.
One was declined.
One left after appointment.
One is pending for decision.
None have been received since Kobe.
