Hello All, 

do I understand it right that only valid combinations should be used?
(not limited to .TLD part)

If not - than it is not going to help (code will pass combinations which can not be used)


Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp)
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)

On Aug 9, 2017, at 19:28, Richard Merdinger <rmerdinger@godaddy.com> wrote:

The RTL/LTR combo, yes, but not specific to a script.  Am I missing something?
 
Richard Merdinger
VP, Domains - GoDaddy
 
 
 
From: Mark Svancarek <marksv@microsoft.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 11:13 AM
To: Richard Merdinger <rmerdinger@godaddy.com>, Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>, Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>, Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: "ua-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org>
Subject: RE: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103
 
Actually, we recently discovered an Edge bug (via the browser review) where the order of labels in a RTL.RTL.ASCII domain name were transposed during rendering.  So I like calling it out explicitly.
 
From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Richard Merdinger
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:10 AM
To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>; 'Don Hollander' <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103
 
I agree; good comment, and I appreciate Hazem taking the time to share it.
 
Richard Merdinger
VP, Domains - GoDaddy
 
 
 
From: <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via UA-discuss" <ua-discuss@icann.org>
Reply-To: Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 8:37 AM
To: Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>, Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: "ua-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103
 
This is a fair comment. We probably need to use the LTR and RTL nomenclatures, which is the essence of those test cases. That also makes it generic for all RTL scripts, not only Arabic.
 
-Dennis
 
From: <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>
Organization: LAS
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:06 AM
To: Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: "UA-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103
 
Hi Don,
 
I was just wondering why is Arabic considered different than Unicode@idn.idn in EAIs?
Arabic characters are Unicode, and Arabic domain names are also IDN.
The only difference is the LTR and RTL reading order, which is probably done by the rendering part, but storing and validating is the same.
 
Regards,
Hazem Hezzah
 
From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Don Hollander
Sent: Wednesday, 09 August, 2017 1:54
To: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103
 
Thanks for the comments on an earlier edition of UA103 – especially from Tex, Jim & Dennis.
 
Please find a second version of the document – with some work still needed in the highlighted sections.
 
 
Also attached as a PDF
 
Your comments would be most welcome indeed.
 
Thanks.

Don