Looks good to me also, but I would change only one thing - Readiness status, first paragraph, “and then do something with them” – it looks to me like a magic J

We can use something more precise like “and then do processing them” or something similar.

Also, I think this report can be published as a blog…

Dusan

From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss
Sent: 23. април 2019. 20:26
To: don.hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>; ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools

Looks good to me.

From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Don Hollander
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 21:30
To: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools

One of the requests that came out of the Barcelona meeting was to do a review of the UA Readiness of Command Line Tools.

Here’s a draft of the report https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grIaNq1p5JhSusI26A

Can I please have comments before the end of the month?

Thanks.

Don

Don Hollander

Secretary General – UASG

Skype: Don_Hollander