I have some tooling that may help with testing unicode behavior/DNS
lookups for more unusual cases that may help relating to a project I
started at ICANN63. It's still rough alpha stage, but it might help
shake look things. Basically, it allows you to setup an entire root zone
with any labels you want in docker containers and then check the
behavior in the browser.
Michael
On 11/9/18 7:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> With my Mozilla hat on, yes, bug reports are always welcome. Migrating
> from IDNA2003 to IDNA2008 is, of course, a big effort...
>
> On 11/9/18 5:21 PM, Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss wrote:
>> Should we file bugs against browsers with these behaviors?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
>> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 4:19 PM
>> To: Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv@microsoft.com>; ua-discuss@icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Fun with Unicode
>>
>> Many of these are invalid under 2008. Yet another example where sticking to the old protocol or UTS#46 hurts us.
>>
>> A
>>
>> --
>> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
>> ----------
>> On November 10, 2018 04:19:35 "Mark Svancarek \(CELA\) via UA-discuss"
>> <ua-discuss@icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshksp
>>> r.mobi%2Fblog%2F2018%2F11%2Fdomain-hacks-with-unusual-unicode-characte
>>> rs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C25ef81dd6f7c415d3fb0
>>> 08d646a22738%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636774059725
>>> 382049&sdata=4tKv6zQWKCHBTTMrwz24D4d90iom%2B%2BRcFrWk00uclew%3D&am
>>> p;reserved=0
>>>
>>> Actually, the remapping by browsers seems bad
>>
>>
>>