“Process” is already one of the 5 Verbs Of UA. The current verbiage prevents the term from being overloaded.
I suppose you could change “The tools generally accept domain names as arguments from the command line, and then do something with them, starting by looking them up in the DNS.”
To
“The tools perform tasks related to the DNS by accepting domain names as arguments from the command line.”
From: Dušan Stojičević <dusan@dukes.in.rs>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 12:29
To: Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv@microsoft.com>; don.hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: RE: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools
Looks good to me also, but I would change only one thing - Readiness status, first paragraph, “and then do something with them” – it looks to me like a magic
J
We can use something more precise like “and then do processing them” or something similar.
Also, I think this report can be published as a blog…
Dusan
From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss
Sent: 23. април 2019. 20:26
To: don.hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>;
ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools
Looks good to me.
From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Don Hollander
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 21:30
To: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools
One of the requests that came out of the Barcelona meeting was to do a review of the UA Readiness of Command Line Tools.
Here’s a draft of the report
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grIaNq1p5JhSusI26A
Can I please have comments before the end of the month?
Thanks.
Don
Don Hollander
Secretary General – UASG
Skype: Don_Hollander
