From: Mark Svancarek
Date: 2017-07-25 08:22
To: John C Klensin
CC: Jiankang; Hollander Don; Nalini J Elkins; HEALTH Yao; Marvin Cheng; uki Ho; Harish Chowdhary; Dr. AJAY D A T A; ua-eai@icann.org; Jan Nelson; Shawn Steele; Stuart Stuple
Subject: RE: HTML 5.2 and Internationalized Eamil Addresses
 >But I don't understand why one would resist changing a spec which is known to be "wrong" and non-RFC compliant.  Is the argument that revising it to be RFC-compliant would risk destabilizing more sites than fixing it?
>
+1
 
I share the same concern with you.
 
Jiankang Yao