Good catch.  The ACE prefix indicates to a parser that the following string is the Punycoded transformation of an IDNA-compatible Unicode string, but is not actually a part of that transformation.

 

From: ua-eai-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-eai-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jiankang Yao
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 6:27 PM
To: Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>; ua-eai@icann.org
Cc: ua-coordination@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-EAI] [UA-Coordination] Revised UASG013 - Quick Guide to EAI

 

Hello,

 

  The definition

"Punycode is an algorithm that converts an IDN into an ASCII string that starts with xn--. The Punycode

algorithm is bi-directional. " needs some adjustment.

 

 

xn--abcdeddaa

where  "xn--" is a prefix and "abcdeddaa" is  output of the Punycode algorithm. So Punycode output does not include "xn--".

 

 

 

 

======================================following are texts from RFC5890===============================

" the string following "xn--" must be the valid output of the Punycode algorithm
                    and must be convertible into valid U-label form."

 

"An "A-label" is the ASCII-Compatible Encoding (ACE, see
      Section 2.3.2.5) form of an IDNA-valid string.  It must be a
      complete label: IDNA is defined for labels, not for parts of them
      and not for complete domain names.  This means, by definition,
      that every A-label will begin with the IDNA ACE prefix, "xn--"
      (see Section 2.3.2.5), followed by a string that is a valid output
      of the Punycode algorithm [RFC3492] and hence a maximum of 59
      ASCII characters in length. "

 


Jiankang Yao

 

From: Don Hollander

Date: 2017-01-22 17:33

To: ua-eai@icann.org

CC: Tan Tanaka, Dennis; Mark Svancarek via UA-Coordination; Dr. AJAY D A T A; Stuart Stuple

Subject: [UA-Coordination] Revised UASG013 - Quick Guide to EAI

Last month I sent out a formatted Quick Guide to EAI.

 

This resulted in a number of comments from Ajay, Stuart, Mark, Lars & Dennis.

 

These enhancements were mostly focused on the Email Service Provider.

 

I have revised the source document which is attached.

 

And for reference, I’m also including the formatted earlier draft.

 

Could I please get any final comments by the end of this week (25th)?

 

Thanks.

 

Don

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don Hollander

Universal Acceptance Steering Group

Skype: don_hollander