With respect to ‘big name’ MTAs, my understanding is that both PostFix and Exim MTAs are EAI ready.

Once we find someone to perform the EAI evaluation we’ll have a clearer idea of just how ready they (and others) are.

Don

On 30/11/2017, at 4:30 PM, John Levine <john.levine@standcore.com> wrote:

Since some email service providers have supported EAI, some Big-name MTAs and email providers should be also persuaded to upgrade at least receive and send EAI address while their own system can still keep ASCII email address.

Gmail already does that.

R`s,
John

From: John Levine
Date: 2017-11-30 10:57
To: ua-eai@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-EAI] Thoughts on EAI Activities
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Jiankang Yao wrote:

I strongly agree with your points.
" Big-name MTAs and email providers" are essential to UA and EAI work.

When I see them at the M3AAWG meeting in March I can certainly ask them
what their EAI plans are. But I can magically predict they`ll say that in
the markets they serve they don`t see a business case yet.
_______________________________________________
UA-EAI mailing list
UA-EAI@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai

Don Hollander

Universal Acceptance Steering Group

www.uasg.tech

don.hollander@icann.org

Skype: don_hollander